Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 5;2019(8):CD013047. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013047.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Ali 2018 This trial compared hyperfractionated versus standard radiotherapy for patients with glioma; more than 70% of participants had glioblastoma
Anand 2012 No comparator arm
Archibald 1994 Wrong comparator arm (healthy controls)
Armstrong 2002 No comparator arm, mixed population
Behrend 2014 Not a study report
Brown 2003b Review article
Brown 2009 Commentary
Buglione 2014 Study of early versus late RT for LGG but only 6 patients had neurocognitive function assessed and neurocognitive scores were not compared between study groups
Cairncross 2006 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Chung 2018 Paricipants all had glioblastoma
Combs 2008 No neurocognitive outcomes
Corn 2009 Before and after study of different doses of RT with no comparator arm
Correa 2008 Treated patients compared with NAT group included patients who had RT (n = 5), RT plus CT (n = 1) but also CT only (n = 3). Data on participants who had RT are not reported separately from those who only had CT
Costello 2004 Wrong comparator (non‐malignant tumour group)
Dai 2011 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Ding 2017 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Ediebah 2015 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Eyre 1993 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Goda 2017 No neurocognitive data reported
Gregor 1996 No comparator arm
Johannesen 2003 No neurocognitive outcomes reported; no relevant comparison
Karim 2002 No neurocognitive outcomes reported
Klein 2004 Not a study but a letter to the editor
Laack 2005 A cohort study of 20 adults who received radiotherapy (50.4Gy or 64.8Gy) for LGG. Cognitive function was reported as stable at 3‐year follow up, but findings were not reported separately by treatment group.
Lunsford 2001 Not a study but a letter to the editor
Malmstrom 2017 All received RT; no late effects data
MRC 2001 All received RT; no late effects neurocognitive outcome data reported
NCT02655601 Study examining participants with high‐grade glioma
Packer 2002 Commentary on a paediatric study
Repka 2018 Recruited patients with high‐grade glioma and glioblastoma
Satoer 2014 Wrong intervention and no late neurocognitive outcomes reported
Shaw 2006 No comparator arm
Sherman 2016 Wrong comparator (published normals)
Sichez 1996 Wrong population ‒ mixed HGG population
Surma‐aho 2001 Retrospective study of effects of RT versus no RT but the study groups were highly selected at baseline and so the findings are impossible to interpret with any certainty
Taphoorn 1994 Not a study but a letter to the editor
Taylor 1998 No comparator arm
Thomas 2001 All received RT; no late effects neurocognitive outcomes data reported
van den Bent 2006 No neurocognitive outcome data reported
Wheeler 2016 Mixed HGG population with low numbers with grade 3; all had RT (question was the effect of immunotherapy)
Wick 2009 No long‐term (> 2 years) neurocognitive outcome data reported
Williamson 2017 This study looked at re‐irradiation of patients with recurrent glioma; some had glioblastoma and no neurocognitive outcomes were reported
Wirsching 2018 This trial examined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients (ARTE trial). All participants had glioblastoma
Zhu 2017 All participants in this trial had glioblastoma

Gy = Grays; LGG = low grade glioma; HGG = high grade glioma;nNAT = no adjuvant treatment; RCT = randomised controlled trial; RT= radiotherapy;