Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2019 Feb 19;56(9):1128–1135. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1572064

Table 2.

Results of multilevel models investigating the role of PrEP status on sexual anxiety, esteem, and satisfaction.

Model 1: Sexual Anxiety
Model 2: Sexual Esteem
Model 3: Sexual Satisfaction
B S.E. p B S.E. p B S.E. p
Level 1 Effects
Intercept 1.46 0.27 < 0.001   2.07 0.30 < 0.001   2.10 0.31 < 0.001   
Assessment Time Point (ref: baseline)
 12-month 0.05 0.09 0.62 0.03 0.10 0.74 0.09 0.11 0.40
 24-month 0.11 0.14 0.43 0.14 0.15 0.36 0.20 0.16 0.21
Partnered (ref: single) −0.03 0.10 0.78 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.28 0.001
College degree (ref: no) 0.06 0.13 0.67 −0.04 0.14 0.79 −0.09 0.15 0.54
CAS acts with casual male partners 0.00 0.01 0.79 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.005
On PrEP (ref: Not on PrEP) −0.27 0.12 0.025 0.06 0.13 0.64 −0.01 0.14 0.96
Level 2 Effects
Age at enrollment −0.01 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.01 0.57
White race (ref: men of color) 0.04 0.16 0.80 −0.04 0.17 0.82 −0.08 0.18 0.67
Bisexual identity (ref: gay) −0.24 0.24 0.32 −0.41 0.27 0.13 −0.10 0.28 0.72
Random Effects
Intercept variance 0.55 0.08 < 0.001   0.64 0.10 < 0.001   0.72 0.11 < 0.001