Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2019 Jun 17;1864(10):1363–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2019.06.011

Table 1. MS analyses of EV-HDL and EL-HDL lipids.

AU/mg HDL protein EV-HDL EL-HDL p-value
PC 461.7 ± 19.39 172.1 ± 5.73 0.0001
PE 18.01 ± 0.35 3.53 ± 0.22  < 0.0001
PI 156.0 ± 6.25 4.01 ± 0.13  < 0.0001
TAG 51.67 ± 1.79 19.52 ± 1.91 0.0003
DAG 45.74 ± 1.52 11.88 ± 0.42  < 0.0001
LPC 41.37 ± 0.68 108.2 ± 3.80  < 0.0001
LPE 0.16 ± 0.004 0.19 ± 0.003 0.0033
FA 223.3 ± 6.78 1834 ± 222.1 0.0019
FC 0.95 ± 0.05 1.32 ± 0.05 0.0067
CE 1036 ± 16.06 1051 ± 102.0 0.8936
Cer 4.065 ± 0.10 5.229 ± 0.14 0.0025
SM 67.89 ± 2.24 75.17 ± 4.58 0.2265

Lipids from EV-HDL and EL-HDL (300 μg protein) purified by ultracentrifugation followed by FPLC were extracted and analyzed by MS. Results are mean ± SEM of 3 independent modifications of human HDL. The differences between EV-HDL and EL-HDL were analyzed by two-tailed unpaired t-test between EV- and EL-HDL. P-values of < 0.004 are considered significant after a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; TAG, triacylglycerol; DAG, diacylglycerol; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine, LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine, FC, free cholesterol, CE, cholesteryl ester; Cer, Ceramide; SM, Sphingomyelin; MS, mass spectrometry; SEM, standard error of mean;