TABLE 3.

Summary of binary logistic regression analysis predicting responding to the devalued stimulus during the post-devaluation habit test in Experiment 1.

Variable	B	SE	Wald	p	Exp(B)
CTQ-SF	0.080	0.034	5.39	0.020	1.083
Level of training (120 trials vs. 600 trials)	0.015	0.320	0.00	0.962	1.016
Devalued side (right vs. left)	–0.073	0.326	0.05	0.822	0.929
STAI state	–0.005	0.018	0.09	0.766	0.995
STAI trait	0.013	0.025	0.27	0.601	1.013
BDI-II	–0.017	0.028	0.37	0.542	0.983
PSS	0.032	0.041	0.60	0.438	1.032
CTQ-SF × length of training	–0.045	0.031	2.07	0.150	0.956
CTQ-SF × devalued side	–0.048	0.033	2.14	0.143	0.953
CTQ-SF × STAI state	0.001	0.002	0.09	0.762	1.001
CTQ-SF × STAI trait	–0.005	0.003	2.84	0.092	0.995
CTQ-SF × BDI-II	–0.001	0.002	0.12	0.730	0.999
CTQ-SF × PSS	0.006	0.004	1.84	0.175	1.006
Age	–0.085	0.094	0.81	0.367	0.919
Gender (male vs. female)	0.166	0.405	0.17	0.681	1.181

Significant results (p < 0.05) shown in bold. For dichotomous predictors, the first term in parenthetical is the reference. CTQ-SF, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire – Short Form (Bernstein et al., 2003); STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger, 1983); BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II (Beck et al., 1996); PSS, Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983).