Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 19;7:222. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0699-5

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard Models of OS vs BMI

anti-CTLA-4 anti-PD-1 Combination
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Univariate Model Overweight (vs Normal BMI) 1.05(0.61,1.8) 0.86 1.29(0.7,2.36) 0.42 0.69(0.29,1.62) 0.39
Obesity (vs Normal BMI) 1.07(0.63,1.8) 0.81 0.88(0.42,1.85) 0.74 0.57(0.19,1.73) 0.32
Multivariable Model Overweight (vs Normal BMI) 0.83(0.47,1.47) 0.52 1.6(0.86,2.96) 0.14 0.7(0.2,2.47) 0.58
Obesity (vs Normal BMI) 1.22(0.75,2) 0.42 1.04(0.48,2.24) 0.92 0.92(0.24,3.49) 0.9
Female 0.73(0.45,1.18) 0.19 0.43(0.24,0.78) 0.01 1.18(0.48,2.92) 0.72
Age at Treatment Initiation 1.01(0.99,1.02) 0.2 1.01(0.98,1.03) 0.61 1.01(0.98,1.04) 0.66
Stage IV at Treatment Initiation(vs Stage III) 15.76(2.12,117.24) 0.01 1.07(0.38,2.98) 0.9 1.12(0.1,12.97) 0.93
ECOG Status 2.23(1.62,3.07) <.001 2.92(1.88,4.51) <.001 2.45(1.47,4.1) 0.001
LDH High 1.62(1.05,2.5) 0.03 2.35(1.27,4.35) 0.01 2.48(0.9,6.85) 0.08
Number of Metastatic Sites 1.2(1,1.44) 0.06 1.16(0.97,1.38) 0.1 0.85(0.58,1.24) 0.4
BRAF Mutated 0.99(0.53,1.85) 0.96 0.78(0.25,2.48) 0.68 0.78(0.19,3.16) 0.73