Table 4.
Reference data | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (%) | 2 (%) | 3 (%) | 4 (%) | 5 (%) | |
Predicted data | |||||
1 | 85.1 | 14.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 10.4 | 79.6 | 9.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
3 | 0.2 | 13 | 74 | 12 | 0.8 |
4 | 0 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 73.6 | 15.9 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 3.1 | 18.4 | 78.5 |
Overall accuracy (%) = 77 |
The % green, % yellow, and % brown pixels from each of the research plots were used as features in a random forest model. This confusion matrix shows how well the random forest model predicted the iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) score from ground-based reference data where each plot was rated on a one through five scale. The overall accuracy was 77%
The diagonal elements are italicized to highlight the percentage of correctly classified field plots in terms of IDC score