Table 4.
Responses about the current state of data deidentification (N=118).
| Measures | Respondents, n (%) | |
| Deidentify when using health care data (n=118) | ||
| Yes | 101 (85.6) | |
| No | 17 (14.4) | |
| Number of applied deidentification methods (n=101) | ||
| 1 method | 37 (31.4) | |
| 2 methods | 33 (28.0) | |
| 3 methods | 18 (15.3) | |
| 4 methods | 4 (3.4) | |
| 5 methods | 9 (7.6) | |
| Applied methods (n=101; multiple response question) | ||
| Pseudonymization | 72 (71.3) | |
| Masking | 57 (56.4) | |
| Data reduction | 37 (36.6) | |
| Data suppression | 30 (29.7) | |
| Aggregation | 22 (21.8) | |
| Difficulties when deidentifying data (n=101) | ||
| Strict social culture | 28 (27.7) | |
| Absence of clear deidentification guideline | 24 (23.8) | |
| Usefulness of deidentified data | 15 (14.9) | |
| Lack of understanding of deidentification policy and technology | 14 (13.9) | |
| Lack of relevant institution support | 11 (10.9) | |
| Lack of deidentification measure for unstructured data | 9 (8.9) | |