Table 1.
Author/publication year | Country | Sample | Method | Patients | Controls | miRNAs studied | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kan et al. [6] | Australia | Serum | Taqman | 28 serous epithelial ovarian cancers | 28 healthy women |
MIR200A
MIR200B MIR200C |
0.675 0.722 0.727 |
0.821 0.893 0.750 |
0.357 0.321 0.536 |
| |||||||||
Gao and Wu [13] | China | Serum | Taqman | 74/19 epithelial/borderline ovarian cancers | 50 healthy women | MIR200C | 0.79 | 0.720 | 0.700 |
| |||||||||
Meng et al. [11] | Germany | Serum | Taqman | 180 epithelial ovarian cancers | 66 healthy women |
MIR25
MIR429 |
0.834 0.704 |
0.924 0.594 |
0.639 0.955 |
| |||||||||
Meng et al. [12] | Germany | Serum exosomes | Taqman | 163 epithelial ovarian cancers | 20 benign ovarian diseases |
MIR200A
MIR200B MIR200C |
0.914 0.815 0.655 |
0.900 1.000 1.000 |
0.839 0.528 0.311 |
| |||||||||
Elias et al. [8] | United States | Serum | Next-generation sequencing | 98 epithelial ovarian cancers | 15 healthy women |
MIR200A
MIR200B MIR200C MIR429 MIR25 |
0.649 0.737 0.779 0.703 0.875 |
0.265 0.500 0.571 0.469 0.602 |
1.000 0.933 0.933 0.867 1.000 |
98 epithelial ovarian cancers | 45 benign ovarian diseases |
MIR200A
MIR200B MIR200C MIR429 |
0.693 0.783 0.762 0.692 |
0.439 0.643 0.673 0.694 |
0.911 0.778 0.756 0.622 |