1. Clear description of the program |
a. Clear Philosophy, Values, and Principles |
i. The philosophy, values, and principles that underlie the program provide guidance for all treatment decisions, program decisions, and evaluations; and are used to promote consistency, integrity, and sustainable effort across all provider organization units. |
b. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria that define the population for which the program is intended |
i. The criteria define who is most likely to benefit when the program is used as intended. |
2. Clear description of the essential functions that define the program |
a. Clear description of the features that must be present to say that a program exists in a given location (essential functions sometimes are called core intervention components, active ingredients, or practice elements) |
3. Operational definitions of the essential functions |
a. Practice profiles describe the core activities that allow a program to be teachable, learnable, and doable in practice; and promote consistency across practitioners at the level of actual service delivery (Hall & Hord, 2011) |
4. A practical assessment of fidelity: the performance of practitioners who are using the program |
a. The performance assessment relates to the program philosophy, values, and principles; essential functions; and core activities specified in the practice profiles; and is practical and can be done repeatedly in the context of typical human service systems. |
b. Evidence that the program is effective when used as intended. |
i. The performance assessment (referred to as “fidelity”) is highly correlated with intended outcomes for children and families. |