Table 1.
The Four Components of a “Useable Innovation”
| Reproduced from Fixsen et al. (2013) by permission of the authors. | |
|---|---|
| 1. Clear description of the program | |
| a. Clear Philosophy, Values, and Principles | |
| i. The philosophy, values, and principles that underlie the program provide guidance for all treatment decisions, program decisions, and evaluations; and are used to promote consistency, integrity, and sustainable effort across all provider organization units. | |
| b. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria that define the population for which the program is intended | |
| i. The criteria define who is most likely to benefit when the program is used as intended. | |
| 2. Clear description of the essential functions that define the program | |
| a. Clear description of the features that must be present to say that a program exists in a given location (essential functions sometimes are called core intervention components, active ingredients, or practice elements) | |
| 3. Operational definitions of the essential functions | |
| a. Practice profiles describe the core activities that allow a program to be teachable, learnable, and doable in practice; and promote consistency across practitioners at the level of actual service delivery (Hall & Hord, 2011) | |
| 4. A practical assessment of fidelity: the performance of practitioners who are using the program | |
| a. The performance assessment relates to the program philosophy, values, and principles; essential functions; and core activities specified in the practice profiles; and is practical and can be done repeatedly in the context of typical human service systems. | |
| b. Evidence that the program is effective when used as intended. | |
| i. The performance assessment (referred to as “fidelity”) is highly correlated with intended outcomes for children and families. |