Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e026037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026037

Table 1.

Meta-regression analysis of HP practices performed ‘often/always’

Predictors Ask Advise Assist Arrange NRT
N studies 9 7 5* 6 6
 No predictors
  I2 resid 96% 91.9% 95.9% 97%
  τ2 0.008 0.0304 0.019 0.017
 Provider type
  P value 0.18 0.487 0.898 0.304
  adj r2 24.7% −1.5% −57.6% 26.4%
  I2 resid 95.6% 87.7% 97.4% 94.8%
  τ2 0.006 0.031 0.029 0.013
 High risk
  P value 0.909 0.571
  adj r2 −14.4% −13.4%
  I2 resid 96.4% 96.7%
  τ2 0.009 0.021
 Country
  P value 0.845 0.252 0.037 0.903
  adj r2 −42.2% 27.6% 66.9% −25.2%
  I2 resid 96.5% 89.4% 84.5% 97.6%
  τ2 0.012 0.022 0.006 0.021
 Year
  P value 0.013
  adj r2 81.9%
  I2 resid 73.9%
  τ2 resid 0.003

*Too few studies, I2 and τ2 not available.

†No high-risk populations.

‡Non-linear, model not performed.

HP, health provider; NRT, nicotine replacement therapy.