Table 1.
Authors | Year | Setting | N= | Arms | Intubation rate (%) | In-ICU mortality rate (%) |
Antonelli et al | 2000 | ICU, monocentre | 20 | O2 | 70 | 50 |
20 | NIV | 20 | 20 | |||
Hilbert et al | 2001 | ICU, monocentre | 26 | O2 | 77 | 69 |
26 | NIV | 46 | 38 | |||
Lemiale et al | 2015 | ICU, multicentre | 183 | O2 | 45 | 25 |
191 | NIV | 38 | 21 | |||
Squadrone et al | 2010 | Ward, monocentre | 20 | O2 | 40 | 75* |
20 | CPAP | 10 | 15* | |||
Frat et al† | 2016 | ICU, multicentre | 30 | O2 | 43 | 20 |
26 | NIV | 65 | 42 | |||
26 | HFOT | 31 | 15 |
Outcomes of patients in the control arm are displayed in italics.
*Hospital mortality (ICU mortality was not indicated in the article).
†Post hoc analysis of a randomised trial.
CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; HFOT, high-flow nasal oxygen therapy;ICU, intensive care unit; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; O2, oxygen therapy.