Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 19;8(4):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.4.29

Table 2.

Summary of Average Response Time in the Two Experiments

Subject
No Zoom
Zoom Out
Percent Changea
Localization task
 S1 25 (20, 31) 29 (24, 34) 15 (−9, 46)
 S2 13 (11, 15) 38 (34, 41) 197 (148, 256)
 S3 14 (11, 17) 24 (21, 27) 75 (44, 112)
 S4 38 (28, 50) 47 (41, 54) 25 (−6, 67)
 S5 31 (25, 38) 25 (21, 29) −20 (−38, 4)
 Average 22 (14, 35) 31 (24, 41) 43 (24, 66)***
Reaching task
 S1 14 (8, 24) 13 (9, 17) −8 (−57, 95)
 S2 8 (7, 9) 9 (7, 11) 14 (−11, 46)
 S3 6 (5, 8) 7 (6, 9) 20 (−4, 49)
 S4 9 (7, 12) 22 (19, 27) 148 (84, 233)
 S5 17 (13, 22) 12 (10, 15) −30 (−51, 0)
 Average 10 (7, 15) 12 (8, 18) 20 (0, 45)

Values for S1–S5 indicate average response time in seconds of all trials for each subject, rounded to whole seconds. Parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals.

a

Percent change for response time is (zoom out – no zoom)/no zoom. Asterisks indicate significant changes. ***P < 0.001.