Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;54(4):416–421. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693046

Table 1. Comparison of flow load, energy until flow, energy until fracture and stiffness per statistical analyses; 95% confidence interval, 95% confidence interval for the mean value.

Variable n Mean value 95% CI for the mean value Minimum value Maximum value p -value a Significant difference b
Flow load (N)
CG 10 697 559–835 316 1,010 Control ≠ PMMA
TGW/O 5 665 480–851 376 860 0.029 No PMMA ≠ PMMA
TGW 5 999 865–1,133 813 1,215
Energy until flow (mm)
CG 10 7.7 7.0–8.4 5.3 9.5
TGW/O 5 7.2 6.5–7.8 6.1 8.1 0.55
TGW 5 7.7 7.1–84 6.7 8.4
Energy up to the flow (J)
CG 10 2.8 2.2–3.4 0.9 3.8
TGW/O 5 2.4 1.6–3.2 1.1 3.3 0.044 No PMMA ≠ PMMA
TGW 5 3.8 3.3–4.4 3.1 4.5
Stiffness (N/mm)
CG 10 90 73–107 60 138
TGW/O 5 93 69–116 62 123 0.035 Control ≠ PMMA
TGW 5 130 108–152 103 166

Abbreviations: CG, control group; CI, confidence interval; PMMA, polymethylmethacrylate; TGW, test group with; TGW/O, test group without.

a

One-way ANOVA.

b

Statistically significant differences at the 5% level according to Tukey's multiple comparison test.