Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun 19;132:107126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107126

Table A1. LMEM of schedule effect on the rate of improvement during training.

Formula: accuracy ~ Length + Frequency + RI + Session*Schedule*(Age + Education + Lesion Volume) + (1 + Length + Frequency + Session| participant) + (1 | item)

Predictor: Estimate Std. Error z-value Pr(>|z|)
Main Effects (Intercept) 2.960 0.404 7.336 <0.001 ***
Word Length −0.279 0.163 −1.709 0.088 .
Word Frequency 0.153 0.089 1.713 0.087 .
Session 0.862 0.168 5.143 <0.001 ***
Schedule 0.330 0.043 7.749 <0.001 ***
Age 0.145 0.340 0.426 0.670
Education 1.175 0.294 4.000 <0.001 ***
Lesion Volume −0.220 0.283 −0.777 0.437
RI 0.052 0.028 1.895 0.058 .

2-Way Interactions Session:Schedule 0.205 0.036 5.719 <0.001 ***
Session:Age −0.139 0.171 −0.809 0.418
Session:Education 0.645 0.166 3.884 <0.001 ***
Session:Lesion Volume −0.291 0.161 −1.800 0.072 .
Schedule:Age −0.178 0.054 −3.285 0.001 **
Schedule:Education −0.093 0.050 −1.863 0.063 .
Schedule:Lesion Volume −0.073 0.048 −1.533 0.125

3-Way Interactions Session:Schedule:Age 0.020 0.048 0.416 0.678
Session:Schedule:Education −0.023 0.050 −0.460 0.646
Session:Schedule:Lesion Volume 0.138 0.042 3.277 0.001 **

Signif. codes: 0.001

***

0.01

**

0.05

*

.0.1