Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug 1;57(3):e59–e68. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.006

Table 2.

Perceptions of Harm or Benefit by E-cigarette Dual or Never Use Among AI Who Smoke

Perceptions of harm or benefit Dual user N=44 Never user N=137 p-value
Perceived harm of cigarettes, n (%) 0.18
 Low 5 (12) 28 (21)
 High 38 (88) 100 (74)
 Don’t know/Not sure 0 8 (6)
Perceived harm of secondhand smoke, n (%) 0.55
 Low 10 (23) 33 (24)
 High 32 (73) 88 (65)
 Don’t know/Not sure 2 (5) 14 (10)
Perceived harm of e-cigarettes, n (%) <0.01
 Low 28 (64) 33 (24)
 High 12 (27) 63 (47)
 Don’t know/Not sure 4 (9) 39 (29)
Perceived harm of secondhand vapor, n (%) <0.01
 Low 33 (77) 39 (29)
 High 6 (14) 47 (35)
 Don’t know/Not sure 4 (9) 48 (36)
E-cigarettes help quit smoking, n (%) <0.01
 Definitely or probably yes 33 (75) 22 (16)
 No 7 (16) 62 (46)
 Don’t know/Not sure 4 (9) 51(38)
E-cigarettes less harmful than cigarettes, n (%) <0.01
 Definitely or probably yes 30 (70) 23 (17)
 No 10 (23) 62 (46)
 Don’t know/Not sure 3 (7) 49 (37)

Notes: Percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding. Boldface indicates a statistically significant finding (p<0.05). Cigarette harms was missing for two, secondhand smoke harms for two, e-cigarette harms for two, secondhand vapor harms for four, perceived helpfulness in quitting smoking for two, and less harmful than cigarettes for five. Missingness did not differ between groups for any of these variables.

AI, American Indian.