Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Res. 2019 Jun 3;211:123–138. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.05.005

Table 1.

Bioprinting methods that have been used to develop vascular grafts and vascularized constructs.

Vascular graft 3D printing strategies 3D printing ASTM process category Material Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Extrusion bioprinting Material extrusion Synthetic and natural biomaterials Commonly used method with well characterized procedure.
Printing resolution up to 200 μm
Bioinks have low cell densities and pressure of nozzle may be harmful to cells 32, 47, 49
Biomaterial-free extrusion bioprinting None (cells & spheroids) Increase cell-cell contact, cellular signaling, biomimicry, preservation of cellular fates Poor mechanical properties 32, 5053
Inkjet bioprinting Material jetting Synthetic and natural biomaterials Single-cell printing resolution Low cell density designs. Challenge to implement due to clogging of nozzles 47, 61, 62
Laser-assisted bioprinting Not applicable Synthetic and natural biomaterials Micro-scale printing resolution & additional computer assisted controls Less common method. Requires rapid gelation of materials after printing, thus tedious process 47, 65, 66