Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Biomater Sci. 2019 Aug 20;7(9):3640–3651. doi: 10.1039/c9bm00388f

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative electron microscopy images and quantitative analyses of coaxially-structured fibers. (A) TEM images of as-spun coaxial fibers. (B) SEM images of coaxial fiber scaffolds, which were polymerized at different UV doses and stored in either dry or hydrated conditions. (C) Fiber diameter before and after hydration of coaxial blends. ‘*’ comparing vs. dry, ‘#’ comparing vs. wet high UV dose. (D) Porosity and (E) Pore size of coaxial blends before and after hydration. ‘*’ comparing vs. dry PCL/PEG-NB. The coaxial microfibers include: PCL/PEG-NB 5k and PCL/PEG-NB 10k. (A): scale bar = 2 μm.