Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;9:12105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48588-1

Table 4.

Comparison of the predictive performance of the in-hospital hypotension with and without the delta neutrophil index (DNI).

Prediction model Incremental value of DNI added to predictive model composed of traditional risk factors
AUROC (95% CI) Difference of AUROC (95% CI) P NRI (95% CI) P IDI (95% CI) P
(A)
Reference (Ref.) model 0.814 (0.750–0.879)
Ref. model + DNIa 0.819 (0.754–0.884) 0.005 (−0.022–0.031) 0.731 0.127 (0–0.254) 0.049* 0.027 (0.004–0.05) 0.023*
(B)
Prediction model Comparison between predictive model composed of traditional risk factors and traditional risk factors combined with DNI
Sensitivity (95% CI) P Specificity (95% CI) P Accuracy (95% CI) P NPV (95% CI) P PPV (95% CI) P
Ref. model 72.1 (60.9–83.4) Ref. 81.4 (76.5–86.3) Ref. 79.5 (75–84.1) Ref. 49.4 (39.1–59.8) Ref. 92.1 (88.4–95.7) Ref.
Ref. model + DNIa 63.9 (51.9–76) 0.020 90.1 (86.3–93.8) <0.001 84.8 (80.8–88.9) 0.001 61.9 (49.9–73.9) <0.001 90.8 (87.2–94.5) 0.170

*P < 0.05, aVariable was logarithmically transformed before analyses. Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic; CI, confidence interval; DNI, delta neutrophil index; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, net reclassification index; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; Reclassification tables comparing two prediction models (See Supplement 4). Reference model = qSOFA score + Heart rate + Body temperature + Platelet count + Neutrophil ratio + Prothrombin ratio + Serum albumin level + Serum alanine aminotransferase level + Total bilirubin + C-reactive protein.