Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 14;9:777. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00777

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author Year Study period Country Mean age (Y) FIGO stage No. patients Ovarian preservation (n) Oophorectomy (n) Rate of ovarian metastases Survival outcome reported
Hopkins et al. (22) 1987 1970–1984 US NA I 24 8 16 0/16 OS
Angel et al. (12) 1992 1966–1990 US 47 I 59 41 18 0/41 OS, PFS
Sutton et al. (13) 1992 1981–1984 GOG NA I 121 41 80 2/80 (2.5%) PFS
Kasamatsu et al. (9) 2009 1984–2003 Japan 48 I-II 123 22 100 6/100 (6%) OS, PFS
Chen et al. (7) 2016 1999–2013 China 43.6 I-II 194 33 153 5/153 (3.3%) OS, PFS
Ruengkhachorn et al. (23) 2016 2006–2013 Thailand 44.9 I 35 16 19 0/19 PFS
Matsuo et al. (24) 2017 1983–2012 SEER 45.3 I 4,019 960 3,059 NA OS
Hu et al. (25) 2017 1994–2015 China 46.2 I–II 105 19 86 3/86 (3.5%) OS
Xie et al. (26) 2018 2003–2015 China 44.3 I–II 128 15 113 1/113 (0.9%) OS
Guo et al. (27) 2018 1995–2017 China NA I–II 267 44 223 13/223 (5.8%) PFS
Total 45.6 5,075 1,199 3,867 30/831 (3.61%)

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GOG, Gynecologic Oncology Group; NA, not available; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival.