Table 1.
MPN-based quantification of L. monocytogenes in samples collected from three tree fruit packing facilities at two time points in March 2018
Log MPN/sponge sample | Facility F1c | Facility F2 | Facility F3c | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wash | Dry | Wax | Wash | Dry | Wax | Wash | Dry | Wax | |
Trial 1a | < LD | < LD | < LD | 3.87 | 5.02 | 4.38 | LD < 1.55d | < LD | LD < 1.55d |
Trial 2b | < LD | < LD | < LD | 3.15 | 3.32 | 5.35 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 2.63 |
Average | < LD | < LD | < LD | 3.51 | 4.17 | 4.87 | < 1.55 | 0.82 | < 2.63 |
aFour dilutions (10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5) were used in the MPN calculation. Each dilution was tested in triplicates. Sample homogenate (a sponge in 90 ml of BLEB) was also enriched
bFive dilutions (10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5, 10−6) were used in MPN calculation. Each dilution was tested in triplicates. Sample homogenate (a sponge in 90 ml of BLEB) was also enriched
c< LD indicates that L. monocytogenes was below the limit of detection, which was at least one viable cell per sample, grown to at least 105 cells/ml by the time the enrichment was completed
dThe level of L. monocytogenes was between the limit of detection and 1.55 log10 MPN/sponge sample. L. monocytogenes was detected in enriched sponge homogenate; however, none of the MPN dilution tubes were positive