Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2019 Aug 14;10:1855. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01855

A Model Based on the Combination of IFN-γ, IP-10, Ferritin and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D for Discriminating Latent From Active Tuberculosis in Children

Patricia Comella-del-Barrio 1, Rosa Abellana 2,, Raquel Villar-Hernández 1, Mariette Doresca Jean Coute 3, Beatriz Sallés Mingels 4, Lydia Canales Aliaga 5, Margareth Narcisse 3, Jacqueline Gautier 3, Carlos Ascaso 2, Irene Latorre 1, Jose Dominguez 1,, Tomas M Perez-Porcuna 6,*,
PMCID: PMC6702835  PMID: 31474956

Abstract

In recent years, pediatric research on tuberculosis (TB) has focused on addressing new biomarkers with the potential to be used as immunological non-sputum-based methods for the diagnosis of TB in children. The aim of this study was to characterize a set of cytokines and a series of individual factors (ferritin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], parasite infections, and nutritional status) to assess different patterns for discriminating between active TB and latent TB infection (LTBI) in children. The levels of 13 cytokines in QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) supernatants were analyzed in 166 children: 74 with active TB, 37 with LTBI, and 55 uninfected controls. All cytokines were quantified using Luminex or ELISA. Ferritin and 25(OH)D were also evaluated using CLIA, and Toxocara canis Ig-G antibodies were detected with a commercial ELISA kit. The combination of IP-10, IFN-γ, ferritin, and 25(OH)D achieved the best diagnostic performance to discriminate between active TB and LTBI cases in children in relation to the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.955 (confidence interval 95%: 0.91–1.00), achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity for the development of a new test (93.2 and 90.0%, respectively). Children with TB showed higher ferritin levels and an inverse correlation between 25(OH)D and IFN-γ levels. The model proposed includes a combination of biomarkers for discriminating between active TB and LTBI in children to improve the accuracy of TB diagnosis in children. This combination of biomarkers might have potential for identifying the onset of primary TB in children.

Keywords: pediatrics, biomarkers, immune response, vitamin D, ferritin, enzyme-linked immunoassays, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, cytokines

Introduction

At least one-quarter of the world’s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018a). Childhood tuberculosis (TB) represents at least 10% of the burden of the disease worldwide, being one of the most significant causes of childhood morbidity and mortality (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018b). Estimations show that there are far more children with TB globally than previously thought, with the majority being undiagnosed and untreated (Dodd et al., 2017). Underdiagnosis in children can occur for multiple reasons, such as the lack of a non-specific clinical presentation that delays seeking healthcare and diagnostic suspicion; the lack of a more accurate diagnostic test; and poor geographical and financial access to healthcare in some areas (Kyu et al., 2018; World Health Organization [WHO], 2018a).

Infants and young children have a higher risk of progressing to TB following a primary M. tuberculosis infection, usually due to a child being exposed to an infectious adult with active TB (Augustynowicz-Kopeć et al., 2012) and to the development of severe forms of the disease (Marais et al., 2004). Therefore, household detection of index TB cases, together with early detection of the infection and TB disease, followed by a prompt treatment, are fundamental in preventing disease progression (Dodd et al., 2018).

The diagnosis of pulmonary TB is a significant challenge in children due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease and the difficulties in expectorating. Although rapid molecular diagnosis represents a significant advance as an alternative to conventional microscopy and culture methods, its sensitivity remains unacceptably low in children since the technique is based on detecting M. tuberculosis from respiratory specimens (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018b). As for immunodiagnostic assays, both the tuberculin-skin-test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs)—that measure cell-mediated immune responses following M. tuberculosis infection—are unable to distinguish between active TB and LTBI (Latorre and Domínguez, 2015) and limit the accuracy of M. tuberculosis detection (Dominguez et al., 2009; Velasco-Arnaiz et al., 2018). As a result, most active TB cases are diagnosed through clinical—and radiological when possible—scoring systems which have limitations due to the clinical presentation of the disease (Graham et al., 2015).

The immature immune system of young children added to the dynamic process of the host–pathogen interaction from M. tuberculosis infection, hamper defining the transition from latent infection to acute TB disease in children. Recently, a diversity of genetic and individual factors that may contribute to the outcome of the host immune set-points during M. tuberculosis infection have been described (Bastos et al., 2018). A good understanding of the diversity of these factors might be crucial to assess the impact of the host-pathogen interactions that occur during M. tuberculosis infection. In this sense, the WHO guidelines for the management of malnourished children, as well as guidelines for national TB programs, underline the importance of the association of malnutrition and TB in children (World Health Organization [WHO], 2013). In addition, the impact of alterations in iron homeostasis and vitamin D deficiencies highlight profound effects on immune function and host defenses due to mechanisms that have not yet been resolved. Lastly, comorbidities by helminth infections impair the inflammatory and immune mechanisms involved in the control of M. tuberculosis infection (Ibrahim et al., 2017).

In recent years, pediatric research has focused on finding new biomarkers in non-sputum-based samples for the detection of M. tuberculosis infection (Nicol et al., 2015). Current studies have highlighted the importance of diverse forms of biomarkers with the potential to be used in immunological methods for the diagnosis of childhood TB (Togun et al., 2018). Furthermore, there is increasing data showing that modified interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) based on the analysis of a combination of different markers could enhance the diagnostic accuracy (Chegou et al., 2014). However, only a few studies with small cohorts have identified some cytokine responses in QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT, QIAGEN, Germany) supernatants which have the potential to monitor specific immunity against M. tuberculosis as candidate combinations of markers for the discrimination between LTBI and active TB in children (Togun et al., 2018). Despite these initial approaches, a clear pattern has not yet emerged, and the diagnostic performance of the cytokine biomarkers reported do not meet the minimum targets recommended by the WHO for a new diagnostic or triage test for TB in children (World Health Organization, 2017).

To our knowledge, no cytokine biomarkers based on QFT-GIT supernatants combined with individual factors can distinguish between active TB and LTBI in children. To improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of TB, the aim of this study was to characterize a set of cytokines and a series of individual factors (ferritin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], parasite infections, and nutritional status) and to assess different patterns for distinguishing between active TB and LTBI in children.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

A prospective case-control study was conducted from August 2015 to December 2016 in the pediatric hospital of Saint Damien in Port-au-Prince (Haiti). Children (0–14 years old) who presented signs and symptoms compatible with active TB and/or documented TB exposure were screened for suspected TB. According to the hospital program, siblings (0–14 years old) of the children diagnosed with TB were also screened for TB or LTBI. Children (0–14 years old) from a school and a kindergarten were screened as uninfected controls. The exclusion criteria were: children with known immunodeficiency, on current immunosuppressive treatment, with a condition that could potentially compromise the immune system (e.g., children from oncology, rheumatology, nephrology and those who had undergone organ transplantation), children who had been under anti-TB treatment or preventive treatment during the previous year, and children not providing informed consent.

The following information was collected: age, sex, weight, height, previous medical history (including TB history, TB exposure, HIV status, and comorbidities, hemogram), vaccines, and current and previous medication (antibiotics, corticosteroids, antiparasitic drugs).

The following signs and symptoms were evaluated: cough and/or fever ≥2 weeks (with no improvement after at least a 7-day course of amoxicillin), recent unexplained weight loss, and asthenia/fatigue. The TST was performed by a trained laboratory technician. Intradermal injection of 0.1 ml of Tubersol (bioequivalent to 5 tuberculin units; Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, ON, Canada) was placed into the ventral surface of the lower arm and read after 72 h. A positive TST result was defined as an induration ≥10 mm in BCG-vaccinated children (those with a BCG scar), and ≥5 mm in non-BCG-vaccinated children or with a known adult TB contact (Bass et al., 1990; American Academy of Pediatrics Tuberculosis, 2009). A standardized specific Z- score for detection of nutritional status weight-for-age (WAZ) was determined by WHO Anthro Plus 1.0.4 software (World Health Organization [WHO], 2009). Children with WAZ scores below −2 standard deviation (SD) were defined as underweight, and a WAZ score above 2 SD was defined as overweight.

A chest radiograph (anterior–posterior image) was performed in all the children screened for TB or LTBI. Chest radiographs were read by two external experts who were blinded to clinical data using a standardized reporting form and a third reader to resolve discordant opinions (Graham et al., 2015). In addition, nasopharyngeal aspirates and induced sputum were collected on three consecutive days for smear examination (auramine stain) by direct fluorescence microscopy in children suspected of having active TB. Histological examination was performed in children with suspicion of extrathoracic TB (ETB) with lymph node adenopathies.

Of all the children screened for TB or LTBI, only those with a positive TST result and/or microscopic confirmation were invited to participate in the study. Of all the children screened in the schools, only those with a negative TST result were invited to participate in the study as uninfected controls.

Treatment and preventive treatment were prescribed in all the children diagnosed with TB or LTBI, respectively. During TB treatment and preventive treatment, the patients were followed monthly until the end of treatment. Children with a positive sputum smear were retested at the fifth and sixth month of treatment.

Definitions for Classification of the Children Enrolled in the Study

Children were classified according to their clinical history, chest radiographs, smear examination, molecular diagnostic test, TST and QFT-GIT results. Active TB cases were defined as confirmed TB —children with relevant signs and symptoms and microbiologic confirmation of M. tuberculosis—, and unconfirmed TB —children without bacteriological confirmation but with relevant signs and symptoms, positive TST and/or QFT-GIT, radiological findings suggestive of TB, known TB contact, and clinical response to anti-TB treatment. Depending on the TB location, active TB cases were classified as ETB or intrathoracic TB. Children with intrathoracic TB were differentiated into those with pulmonary involvement (PTB) and children with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy in the absence of lung parenchyma involvement (Mediastinal TB). LTBI cases were defined as children with documented TB exposure, positive TST and/or QFT-GIT, normal chest radiographs, and no clinical signs of TB development in the last 6 months after diagnosis. Finally, uninfected controls were defined as asymptomatic children with no history of TB exposure, and negative TST and QFT-GIT.

Laboratory Tests Performed

Molecular Diagnostic Test

Sputum samples were collected from children with microscopy confirmation and/or radiological findings to perform GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube

In all the participants, a 3 ml blood sample was drawn for conventional QFT-GIT; the antigen tube (ESAT-6, CFP-10, and TB-7.7), and positive (phytohemagglutinin, mitogen) and negative (no antigen, nil) controls. Tubes were incubated at 37°C for 16–24 h and centrifuged according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasma was harvested and stored at −20°C until performing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). After the screening and recruitment of cases, plasma samples were sent to the laboratories of the Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP, Badalona, Spain) following optimum conservation conditions. Once there, the supernatants were analyzed and the results were interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Ferritin, 25(OH)D, and Toxocara spp. Detection

One milliliter of blood from all the participants was added to the biochemical tube to perform ferritin, 25(OH)D, and Toxocara canis determination. Ferritin and 25(OH)D concentrations were analyzed at the biochemistry laboratory of the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital (Badalona, Spain) with a Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) method using a Liaison instrument (DiaSorin Liaison, Stillwater, MN, United States). 25(OH)D is an indirect method to measure vitamin D in the blood. According to the literature, serum 25(OH)D levels equal or above 20 ng/ml were considered normal levels of vitamin D (Michael and Holick, 2007). To avoid variations during blood sampling, the blood was almost always collected on the same day of the week at approximately the same hour (13–15 h). Seasonal fluctuations did not affect sampling because the weather seasons in Haiti are barely defined. T. canis Ig-G antibodies were detected at the IGTP laboratory using a commercial ELISA kit (Ridascreen, R-Biopharm AG, Germany). Results with a sample index above 1.1 were considered positive according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Detection of Soil-Transmitted Parasite Infections

Stool samples were collected to detect intestinal parasites in all the participants. Stool samples were processed on the same day of collection at the laboratory of the pediatric hospital of Saint Damien using the Kato-Katz and formalin–gasoline technique (a modification of the formalin-ether sedimentation technique) as described previously (Katz et al., 1972; Ahmadi and Damraj, 2009) and were examined with optical microscopy.

Cytokine Measurement

Frozen supernatants remaining from the QFT-GIT tubes were used for the measurement of cytokine concentrations using a bead-based multiplex assay (Luminex 11-plex cytokine kit, R&D Systems, United Kingdom) and measured by Bioplex manager software (version 5.0, Bio-Rad, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After optimization experiments, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon (IFN)-gamma (γ), interleukin (IL)-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-22, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (α) were analyzed in a 1:8-fold dilution, while IL-1RA and induced protein (IP)-10 were analyzed in 1:8, 1:80, and 1:160-fold dilutions. In this way, values were within the detection limits marked in the standard curve. IL-32 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured by DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, United Kingdom) because of incompatibilities with the human custom multiplex cytokine kit. ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Qualitative variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Qualitative variables were described using median and interquartile ranges (IQR), or, using mean and standard deviation (SD) in case of variables were with a normally distribution, using mean and standard deviation. The independent variables analyzed were: sex, age, weight by age, BCG, hemoglobin levels, 25(OH)D levels, ferritin levels, the presence of intestinal helminths, IgG T. canis antibodies, and cytokines responses. The concentration of released cytokines released in response to M. tuberculosis antigens (Ag-TB) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA) was calculated by subtracting the concentration measured in the nil tube (Ag-TB, antigen minus nil; and PHA, mitogen minus nil). For all the variables with a normal distribution, the comparison between several groups was performed using the analysis of variance or Student’s t-student test (only two groups). However, for variables non-normally distributed variables, the comparison between groups was performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests. In the case of qualitative variables, comparisons were performed using the Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared test. The Tukey method (normal distribution) or Benjamini and Hochberg method (non-normal distribution) was used to correct p-values in multiple comparisons. The cytokines that showed significant differences between study groups were evaluated and considered.

Multivariate logistic regression was performed to detect variables able to classify individuals among the three different study groups (active TB, LTBI, and uninfected). The forward method was used for selecting the best combinations of cytokines. Participants with a positive QFT-GIT result (TB and LTBI) were analyzed separately (Binomial) from those with a negative QFT-GIT result (TB, LTBI, and uninfected; Multinomial). The results were expressed using the odds ratios (OR) and their confidence intervals. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for assessing the value of performing a diagnostic test. The receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. The optimal cut-off value was identified to maximize the difference between true positive and false positives subjects. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

These analyses were performed using the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics v. 25 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States), R package v.3.0.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and GraphPad PRISM v. 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States).

Results

Study Subjects

A total of 305 children suspected of having LTBI or TB were screened in the hospital, whereas a total of 96 uninfected children were screened in a school and a kindergarten. Among the patients screened at the hospital, 156 were recruited, and 149 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (informed consent not obtained, negative TST). Of the 156 participants, 111 (71.2%) were analyzed in the study, and 45 (28,8%) were lost to follow-up and were therefore not included in the analysis due to lack of complementary tests necessary for clinical assessment (chest radiographs, biopsies). Among the children screened at school and kindergarten, 55 were recruited and analyzed, and 41were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (informed consent not obtained, positive TST). Among the 166 children analyzed (111 screened at the hospital and 55 screened at school and kindergarten), 74 had active TB (44.6%), 37 had LTBI (22.3%), and 55 were uninfected (33.1%). Of the 74 active TB cases, 8 had ETB, and 66 had intrathoracic TB. Among the intrathoracic TB children, 48 had PTB, and 18 had Mediastinal TB (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram of enrollment. TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; ETB, extrathoracic TB; PTB, intrathoracic TB with pulmonary involvement; Mediastinal TB, intrathoracic TB with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy in the absence of lung parenchyma involvement.

Table 1 shows the description, demographic, and clinical characteristics among study groups according to their QFT-GIT result. Significant differences were observed in age and body WAZ z-scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) among the study groups with different QFT-GIT results (positive, negative, and indeterminate). Whereas LTBI cases with positive QFT-GIT were older than active TB cases with negative QFT-GIT (p = 0.002), active TB cases with positive QFT-GIT had lower WAZ z-scores than uninfected controls (p = 0.001). However, comparisons among QFT-GIT results within each study group (TB, LTBI, and non-infected) were performed, and no significant differences were observed.

TABLE 1.

Description and comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics among the study groups according to QFT-GIT results.

Study groups classified by QFT-GIT result (n = 166)
Active TB (n = 74)
LTBI (n = 37)
Uninfected (n = 55)
p. overall
Positive n = 62 Negative n = 9 Indeterminate n = 3 Positive n = 22 Negative n = 12 Indeterminate n = 3 Negative n = 55
Gender 0.548
Female 26(41.9%) 5(55.6%) 2(66.7%) 12(54.5%) 6(50.0%) 3(100%) 25(45.5%)
Male 36(58.1%) 4(44.4%) 1(33.3%) 10(45.5%) 6(50.0%) 0(0%) 30(54.5%)
Age in years 85.3 (44.8) 47.3 (51.6) 59.0(32.0)a 114(45.6)a 80.6 (44.6) 48.7 (19.5) 76.5 (35.2) 0.001
Range 0.008
< 5 years 25(40.3%) 7(77.8%) 2(66.7%) 5(22.7%) 6(50.0%) 3(100%) 32(58.2%)
>5 years 37(59.7%) 2(22.2%) 1(33.3%) 17(77.3%) 6(50.0%) 0(0%) 23(41.8%)
Body weight-for-age
Z-score (SD) −1.39(1.70)a −1.70(1.09) −1.78(1.06) −0.66(0.98) −1.57(1.50) −0.92(1.23) −0.30(1.00)a 0.001
BCG scar 0.424
Yes 41(69.5%) 7(87.5%) 2(66.7%) 15(71.4%) 9(100%) 1(50.0%) 39(72.2%)
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 10.4 (2.02) 9.89 (0.97) 9.57 (0.84) 11.2 (1.30) 11.0 (1.37) 11.0 (3.33) 11.5 (0.66) 0.457

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%), and quantitative variables are expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) or standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between pairwise comparisons (a). QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; Z-score, default classification system used to present child nutritional status; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

Characterization of Subjects With a Positive QFT-GIT Test

Comparisons between the groups with active TB and positive QFT-GIT were performed (Table 2). The Ag-TB levels of IL-17A, GM-CSF, together with the PHA levels of TNF-α, GM-CSF and, IL-13, and median hemoglobin levels showed significant differences between active TB groups (p = 0.009, p = 0.027, p = 0.027, p = 0.040 and p = 0.042, p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, pairwise comparisons showed that Ag-TB levels of IL-17A and GM-CSF, together with the PHA levels of TNF-α and IL-13, were higher in children with Mediastinal TB than in those with PTB (p = 0.009 and 0.042, p = 0.025 and p = 0.050, respectively). Likewise, hemoglobin levels were significantly higher in children with Mediastinal TB than in children with PTB or ETB (p = 0.014 and p = 0.014, respectively). No biomarker showed significant differences between the PTB and ETB groups. Therefore, the groups of children with PTB and extrapulmonary TB were merged and analyzed as a single group (TB, n = 44), while children with Mediastinal TB (n = 18) were analyzed separately.

TABLE 2.

Description and comparison of demographic, clinical, and cytokine responses among active TB cases with positive QFT-GIT.

Study subjects with active TB and a positive QFT-GIT assay classified by disease location (n = 62)
PTB ETB Mediastinal TB p. overall
n = 36 n = 8 n = 18
Gender 0.935
Male 20 (55.6%) 5 (62.5%) 11 (61.1%)
Age in years 76.0 [34.5; 115] 89.5 [55.5; 100] 99.0 [70.2; 130] 0.187
Range 0.406
<5 years 17 (47.2%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (27.8%)
>5 years 19 (52.8%) 5 (62.5%) 13 (72.2%)
Body weight-for-age
Z-score −1.24 [−2.74; 0.08] −2.07 [−2.79; −1.13] −0.98 [−2.37; −0.21] 0.334
BCG scar 0.854
Yes 23 (69.7%) 5 (62.5%) 13 (72.2%)
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 10.3 [8.90; 11.6]a 9.00 [8.15; 10.9]b 12.0 [10.8; 12.1]a b 0.006
Intestinal parasites
Protozoa (cyst) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (33.3%) 0.308
Helminths (ova) 0 (0%) 1 (33.3%) 0 (0%) 0.120
Serology Toxocara spp. 0.099
Negative 31 (86.1%) 5 (62.5%) 11 (64.7%)
Positive 5 (13.9%) 3 (37.5%) 6 (35.3%)
Ferritin (ng/ml) 98.4 [33.0; 201] 138 [78.5; 218] 64.4 [47.4; 117] 0.276
25 (OH) D(ng/ml) 26.6 [20.6; 34.5] 30.2 [26.3; 34.2] 28.6 [21.8; 31.2] 0.735
Range 1.000
Normal levels 27 (75.0%) 6 (75.0%) 14 (77.8%)
Deficiency 9 (25.0%) 2 (25.0%) 4 (22.2%)
Cytokine response (pg/ml)
Ag-TB
   TNF-α 105 [−46.08; 399] 53.1 [36.3; 248] 136 [66.2; 386] 0.400
   IP-10 31153 [12825; 47686] 37425 [10304; 57206] 33127 [29369; 48717] 0.778
   IL-10 39.5 [23.9; 59.3] 36.4 [16.9; 56.7] 52.4 [47.2; 62.0] 0.060
   IFN-γ 3922 [1150; 10449] 3855 [2957; 6969] 7020 [4866; 13847] 0.200
   IL-1RA 27796 [12141; 42882] 25015 [13848; 66213] 23673 [15354; 51940] 0.928
   IL-17A 7.58 [1.51; 12.6]a 5.67 [0.00;19.2] 23.1 [9.13; 35.9]a 0.009
   GM-CSF 41.4 [8.04; 97.1]a 28.9 [11.5; 54.8]b 83.6 [39.6; 201]a b 0.027
   IL-13 716 [315; 1350] 1342 [534; 1876] 1326 [984; 1755] 0.071
   IL-5 3.32 [0.00; 7.05] 0.00 [0.00; 13.5] 8.59 [3.53; 25.7] 0.204
   IL-32 30.1 [−122.86; 64.1] 59.4 [−25.44; 396] 77.1 [−10.03; 360] 0.222
   VEGF −381.77 [−784.77; −120.49] −903.69 [−1128.04; −499.36] −468.37 [−931.27; −173.86] 0.150
PHA
   TNF-α 4961 [2833; 8837]a 4850 [3446; 7646] 9762 [4829; 12489]a 0.027
   IP-10 4718 [2862; 7972] 5335 [2623; 16865] 6952 [814; 19877] 0.840
   IL-10 −2.79 [−11.05; 0.00] 0.00 [−0.30; 0.91] 0.00 [−1.99; 0.92] 0.071
   IFN-γ 1102 [632; 3913] 1029 [876; 1878] 1828 [1131; 8723] 0.272
   IL-1RA 46679 [27310; 80379] 39813 [17196; 46881] 82727 [29720; 142991] 0.311
   IL-17A 39.8 [13.4; 129] 9.07 [6.54; 13.1] 19.8 [8.22; 81.8] 0.057
   GM-CSF 65.2 [34.1; 118] 26.7 [9.59; 46.5]b 74.7 [54.8; 112]b 0.040
   IL-13 1211 [664; 1970]a 1536 [1132; 2023] 2150 [1423; 2608]a 0.042
   IL-5 4.28 [0.00; 7.38] 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] 2.98 [0.52; 4.76] 0.064
   IL-32 43.9 [−74.11; 243] 7.99 [−98.12; 686] 243 [69.0; 739] 0.109
   VEGF −62.75 [−368.65; 228] −434.83 [−559.52; −156.10] −73.02 [−503.76; 517] 0.297
Nil
   TNF-α 151 [40.3; 250] 33.6 [17.3; 178] 106 [55.3; 209] 0.388
   IP-10 673 [412; 1220] 745 [529; 1082] 973 [616; 1201] 0.573
n = 36 n = 8 n = 18
   IL-10 8.52 [1.62; 16.3] 0.88 [0.00; 5.10] 5.45 [3.49; 9.86] 0.168
   IFN-γ 197 [114; 509] 310 [106; 454] 200 [171; 451] 0.872
   IL-1RA 14867 [9160; 22252] 11778 [6783; 27489] 12406 [8385; 20155] 0.765
   IL-17A 0.00 [0.00; 11.3] 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] 3.33 [0.00; 19.7] 0.239
   GM-CSF 1.92 [0.00; 16.2] 0.00 [0.00; 2.41] 2.67 [0.85; 5.27] 0.414
   IL-13 311 [147; 622] 257 [0.00; 423] 341 [292; 444] 0.604
   IL-5 0.00 [0.00; 5.88] 0.00 [0.00; 8.95] 3.26 [0.00; 5.52] 0.937
   IL-32 1096 [508; 2241] 1606 [699; 2579] 1558 [1101; 2840] 0.376
   VEGF 702 [175; 1801] 935 [726; 1128] 693 [368; 1323] 0.830

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%), and quantitative variables are expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) or standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between pairwise comparisons (a, b). QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; PTB, Intrathoracic TB with pulmonary involvement; ETB, Extrathoracic TB; Mediastinal TB, Intrathoracic TB with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy in the absence of lung parenchyma involvement; Z-score, default classification system used to present child nutritional status; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Ag-TB, antigen-dependent response; PHA, mitogen-induced response. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

Comparisons between the TB group (n = 44) and LTBI cases with a positive QFT-GIT (n = 22) were performed (Table 3). The Ag-TB levels of IP-10 along with ferritin levels were significantly higher in children with TB than in children with LTBI (p = 0.005 and p = 0.019, respectively). However, the PHA levels of IFN-γ were significantly lower in children with TB than in those with LTBI (p < 0.001). Although nil levels of IL-5 showed significant differences between groups (p = 0.007), this cytokine was not considered in the analysis because almost all the results of the LTBI cases (20/22) and more than half of those of the children who belonged to the TB group (24/44) were below the standard curve. Regarding the association of T. canis with IL-5, no significant differences were found between Ag-TB, PHA and nil IL-5 levels and T. canis in the groups with positive QFT-GIT (p-values of 0.202, 0.508, and 0.053, respectively). Moreover, the eosinophil count was determined, but because only 25% of the children had an eosinophil count, this variable was not included in the analysis of the study. Despite the few results, no significant differences were found between Ag-TB, PHA and nil IL-5 levels and eosinophil count in the groups with a positive QFT-GIT (p-values of 0.848, 0.923, and 0.768, respectively).

TABLE 3.

Description and comparison of demographic, clinical, and cytokine response between groups with a positive QFT-GIT.

Subjects with a positive QFT-GIT assay (n = 66)
Active TB* LTBI p. overall
n = 44 n = 22
Body weight-for-age
Z-score −1.32 [−.74; −0.17] −0.64 [−1.58; 0.08] 0.061
Intestinal parasites
Protozoa (cyst) 0 (0%) 1 (50.0%) 0.200
Helminths (ova) 1 (5.88%) 1 (16.7%) 0.462
Toxocara spp. 0.324
Negative 36 (81.8%) 13 (68.4%)
Positive 8 (18.2%) 6 (31.6%)
Ferritin(ng/ml) 109 [38.2; 201] 52.2 [32.5; 70.9] 0.019
25 (OH) D(ng/ml) 27.6 [20.8; 34.5] 24.7 [21.2; 30.3] 0.563
Range 0.755
Normal levels 33 (75.0%) 18 (81.8%)
Deficiency 11 (25.0%) 4 (18.2%)
Cytokine responses (pg/ml)
Ag-TB
   TNF-α 71.0 [−40.32; 364] 47.5 [−26.19; 151] 0.654
   IP-10 31545 [12093; 48379] 7762 [3676; 26629] 0.005
   IL-10 39.3 [22.1; 59.3] 22.9 [12.1; 44.2] 0.121
   IFN-γ 3922 [1201; 10427] 1832 [672; 9569] 0.221
   IL-1RA 27796 [12141; 48396] 13918 [4821; 33546] 0.138
   IL-17A 7.58 [0.40; 14.9] 10.5 [0.88; 60.2] 0.173
   GM-CSF 34.5 [8.04; 97.1] 30.2 [18.4; 60.3] 0.828
   IL-13 728 [315; 1468] 427 [171; 1229] 0.118
   IL-5 2.90 [0.00; 7.05] 0.00 [0.00; 8.99] 0.579
   IL-32 34.7 [−99.73; 72.6] −63.80 [−176.88; 59.4] 0.206
VEGF −442.15 [−913.46; −138.11] −357.76 [−1013.21; −81.31] 0.775
PHA
   TNF-α 4850 [2833; 8837] 6290 [4103; 9904] 0.226
   IP-10 4718 [2680; 9102] 4392 [1800; 8974] 0.644
n = 44 n = 22
   IL-10 −0.47 [−9.25; 0.00] −5.14 [−8.32; −1.05] 0.307
   IFN-γ 1102 [717;2984] 4420 [2137; 11309] <0.001
   IL-1RA 42206 [27310; 69517] 45310 [27013; 112972] 0.812
   IL-17A 26.0 [9.06; 112] 99.5 [18.9; 229] 0.053
   GM-CSF 55.1 [24.4; 103] 79.4 [47.3; 135] 0.121
   IL-13 1232 [683; 1973] 1180 [796; 1812] 0.946
   IL-5 2.92 [0.00; 6.98] 0.91 [0.00; 10.1] 0.967
   IL-32 32.9 [−74.11; 304] −1.83 [−57.38; 75.4] 0.391
   VEGF −108.91 [−462.16; 181] −315.24 [−871.29; −16.37] 0.135
   Nil
   TNF-α 139 [35.0; 250] 90.0 [38.0; 185] 0.654
   IP-10 680 [423; 1189] 435 [208; 1208] 0.161
   IL-10 7.63 [0.19; 14.9] 9.40 [5.28; 13.0] 0.526
   IFN-γ 226 [111; 508] 241 [179; 388] 0.523
   IL-1RA 14041 [8927; 23001] 11090 [6497; 17128] 0.106
   IL-17A 0.00 [0.00; 10.4] 0.00 [0.00; 2.46] 0.764
   GM-CSF 0.89 [0.00; 12.3] 0.83 [0.00; 5.30] 0.429
   IL-13 302 [114; 595] 256 [146; 499] 0.683
   IL-5 0.00 [0.00; 6.96] 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] 0.007
   IL-32 1112 [556; 2241] 1726 [1033; 2590] 0.334
   VEGF 809 [209; 1610] 688 [317; 1381] 0.870

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%), and quantitative variables are expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) or standard deviation (SD). QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; Z-score, default classification system used to present child nutritional status; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Ag-TB, antigen-dependent response; PHA, mitogen-induced response. *In this table, children with Mediastinal TB were not included in the active TB cases. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

Characterization of Subjects With a Negative QFT-GIT Test

Comparisons among active TB cases (n = 9), LTBI cases (n = 12) and uninfected controls (n = 55) with a negative QFT-GIT (n = 22) were performed (Table 4). The PHA levels of IL-10, IL-13, and IL-32, together with the nil levels of TNF-α and IL-10, the underweight levels, and 25(OH)D levels showed significant differences (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p = 0.004, p = 0.001 and p = 0.044, p = 0.001, and p = 0.037, respectively). Furthermore, pairwise comparisons showed that PHA levels of IL-10 were significantly higher in TB and LTBI cases than in uninfected controls (p = 0.020 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas the PHA levels of IL-32 were significantly higher in LTBI cases than in TB cases, and uninfected controls (p = 0.034 and p = 0.004, respectively), and the PHA levels of IL-13 were significantly higher in LTBI cases compared to uninfected controls (p = 0.006). Otherwise, the nil TNF-α levels were significantly higher in uninfected controls compared to LTBI cases (p < 0.001). Regarding levels of malnourishment, the WAZ z-scores were significantly lower in TB and LTBI cases than in uninfected controls (p = 0.006 and p = 0.006, respectively). On the contrary, the median 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in LTBI cases compared to uninfected controls (p = 0.022).

TABLE 4.

Description and comparison of demographic, clinical, and cytokine response between groups with a negative QFT-GIT.

Subjects with a Negative QFT-GIT assay (n = 76)
Active TB LTBI Uninfected p. overall
n = 9 n = 12 n = 55
Body weight-for-age
Z-score (SD) −1.44 [−2.45; −1.00]a −1.55 [−2.03; −0.58]b −0.59 [−1.08; 0.32]ab 0.001
Intestinal parasites
Protozoa (cyst) 0 (0%) 3 (50.0%) 0 (0%) 0.464
Helminths (ova) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (4.55%) 1.000
Toxocara spp. 0.314
Negative 6 (66.7%) 7 (58.3%) 42 (77.8%)
Positive 3 (33.3%) 5 (41.7%) 12 (22.2%)
Ferritin (ng/ml) 68.5 [51.0; 84.6] 44.0 [28.4; 77.7] 37.1 [20.3; 55.4] 0.075
25 (OH) D(ng/ml) 29.6 [24.1; 30.1] 30.4 [27.7; 34.4]b 26.5 [24.6; 30.0]b 0.037
Range
Deficiency 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (3.84%)
Cytokine response (pg/ml)
Ag-TB
   TNF-α −26.62 [−59.20; 4.27] −7.89 [−37.82; 0.51] −57.31 [−321.36; 72.9] 0.385
   IP-10 544 [−34.59; 795] 94.6 [49.9; 1332] 219 [85.6; 594] 0.894
   IL-10 1.44 [−2.71; 9.21] 3.77 [0.85; 6.40] 0.85 [−1.64; 9.29] 0.918
   IFN-γ 88.4 [0.00; 196] 54.4 [−5.32; 239] 23.3 [−2.05; 82.1] 0.525
   IL-1RA 4361 [1455; 9833] 3204 [1280; 7608] 3812 [1853; 9435] 0.886
   IL-17A 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] 0.00 [−22.20; 6.61] 0.00 [0.00; 1.12] 0.751
   GM-CSF 1.45 [−1.10; 5.08] 0.00 [0.00; 1.45] 0.04 [−5.15; 1.52] 0.670
   IL-13 361 [67.3; 591] 81.5 [23.5; 565] 56.0 [0.00; 200] 0.240
   IL-5 0.00 [−0.46; 0.00] 0.00 [0.00; 0.49] 0.00 [0.00; 1.88] 0.171
   IL-32 5.89 [−145.98; 222] 106 [−143.37; 256] −52.81 [−218.53; −6.17] 0.197
   VEGF −769.46 [−1673.90; 0.00] −57.79 [−1369.04; 19.9] −243.45 [−466.44; −22.59] 0.295
PHA
   TNF-α 7244 [2691; 8401] 4609 [2837; 6360] 6932 [5104; 9965] 0.261
   IP-10 7177 [4600; 11211] 6415 [5166; 9139] 6524 [3733; 10553] 0.819
   IL-10 −8.92 [−13.01; −4.87]a −9.43 [−11.82; −7.98]b −0.43 [−6.29; 0.00]ab < 0.001
   IFN-γ 3092 [2179; 4970] 4808 [3212; 9358] 3998 [1897; 7064] 0.536
   IL-1RA 72506 [42906; 111675] 148877 [70665; 201214] 68339 [30968; 172755] 0.184
   IL-17A 105 [8.75; 180] 131 [80.7; 224] 80.0 [30.4; 216] 0.390
   GM-CSF 39.3 [33.8; 99.2] 64.1 [46.6; 93.7] 71.5 [42.6; 143] 0.186
   IL-13 1948 [1467; 2146] 2400 [2021; 2978]b 1563 [789; 2236]b 0.007
   IL-5 5.24 [0.91; 5.69] 2.99 [0.00; 11.4] 3.42 [1.15; 6.68] 0.789
   IL-32 −198.07 [−315.19; −9.88]c 280 [67.2; 367]bc −24.34 [−160.79; 66.4]b 0.004
   VEGF 0.00 [−853.06; 782] 0.00 [−780.01; 374] −27.36 [−358.31; 138] 0.703
Nil
   TNF-α 228 [71.7; 300] 69.5 [40.4; 99.2]b 312 [155; 809]b 0.001
   IP-10 938 [301; 1667] 561 [413; 2085] 487 [317; 770] 0.291
   IL-10 12.3 [8.92; 27.5] 14.0 [10.1; 16.5] 7.75 [3.59; 16.0] 0.044
   IFN-γ 321 [0.00; 862] 255 [67.9; 440] 199 [89.0; 434] 0.911
   IL-1RA 11598 [7467; 18694] 10372 [8682; 16165] 13409 [9432; 22543] 0.304
   IL-17A 0.00 [0.00; 44.3] 0.00 [0.00; 26.5] 0.00 [0.00; 0.71] 0.220
   GM-CSF 4.98 [0.00; 9.43] 0.00 [0.00; 3.76] 1.30 [0.00; 14.6] 0.258
   IL-13 1166 [478; 1519] 376 [324; 727] 373 [206; 947] 0.069
   IL-5 0.46 [0.00; 4.96] 0.00 [0.00; 2.49] 3.07 [0.00; 5.52] 0.122
   IL-32 1242 [1006; 1740] 2020 [1384; 4215] 1532 [657; 3754] 0.332
VEGF 1029 [626; 1674] 1546 [491; 2629] 484 [222; 1189] 0.113

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%), and quantitative variables are expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) or standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between pairwise comparisons corrections (a, b, c). QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; Z-score, default classification system used to present child nutritional status; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Ag-TB, antigen-dependent response; PHA, mitogen-induced response. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

Discriminative Biomarker Profiles in Subjects With Positive QFT-GIT

The adjusted logistic model showed a set of 4 biomarkers able to discriminate between active TB and LTBI: ferritin, 25(OH)D, IP-10, and IFN-γ (Table 5).

TABLE 5.

Classification table of the model for the study groups with positive QFT-GIT results and variables included in the equation.

Classification table of the Active TB* and LTBI cases with positive QFT-GIT results and variables included in the equation
B P-value Odds Ratio [CI 95%]
25 (OH) D (ng/ml) 0.20 0.012 1.22 [1.05; 1.43]
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.02 0.010 1.02 [1.01; 1.03]
Cytokine response (pg/ml)
Ag-TB
   IP-10 0.08 0.017 1.08 [1.01; 1.15]
   INF-γ 0.12 0.064 1.13 [0.99; 1.29]
   PHA
   IP-10 0.59 0.007 1.80 [1.18; 2.75]
   INF-γ −0.77 0.008 0.46 [0.26; 0.82]
Constant −8.67 0.004

Binomial Logistic Regression. B, regression coefficient; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval. QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Ag-TB, antigen-dependent response; PHA, mitogen-induced response. *In this table, children with Mediastinal TB were not included in the active TB cases.Cytokine levels were multiplied x10. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

For each increased unit of IFN-γ (in Ag-TB responses), IP-10 (in Ag-TB and PHA responses), ferritin, and 25(OH)D, the odds of being classified as a TB case increased by 1.08, 1.80, 1.13, 1.02, and 1.22, respectively. However, for each increased unit of IFN-γ (in PHA responses), the odds of being classified as a TB case decreased by 0.46. Therefore, the profile to classify a subject with TB but not LTBI is that of low IFN-γ levels (in PHA responses) but high IP-10 (in Ag-TB and PHA responses), 25(OH)D, and ferritin levels.

The model based on the four host-markers mentioned above was able to correctly classify 93.2% of children with TB, and 90.0% of children with LTBI. In addition, the area under the ROC curve of this model was 0.955 (CI 95%: 0.91 to 1.00), and the positive and negative likelihood ratio were 9.32 and 0.08, respectively (Figure 2). Furthermore, when Mediastinal TB was included, the model correctly classified 76.2% of these into the TB group. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the diagnostic performance of the different combination possibilities of the four host-markers selected in the adjusted logistic model.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

ROC curve of the four markers presented in the model [IFN-γ, IP-10, Ferritin, and 25(OH)D] to discriminate between active TB (N = 44) and latent TB infected cases (N = 37) with positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube result. AUC, Area under ROC curve.

Discriminative Biomarker Profiles in Subjects With Negative QFT-GIT

The adjusted logistic model showed a set of 3 biomarkers able to discriminate among active TB, LTBI, and uninfected controls: IL-10, IL-13, and IL-32 (Table 6). For each increased unit of IL-13 and IL-32 (in PHA responses), the odds of being classified as LTBI case increased by 1.003 and 1.003, respectively. However, for each increased unit of IL-10 (in PHA responses), the odds of being classified as uninfected control decreased by 0.93 and 0.01, respectively.

TABLE 6.

Classification table for the study groups with negative QFT-GIT results and variables included in the equation.

Classification table of the study groups with negative QFT-GIT results and variables included in the equation
Modela B P-value Odds Ratio [CI 95%]
Active TB
PHA (pg/ml)
Constant −4.67
    IL-10 −0.071 0.036 0.93 [0.87; 0.99]
    IL-13 1.25 × 10–3 0.073 1.01 [1.00; 1.01]
    IL-32 3.42 × 10–4 0.751 1.00 [0.99; 1.01]
LTBI
PHA (pg/ml)
Constant −8.873
   IL-10 −0.095 0.009 0.910 [0.85; 0.98]
   IL-13 3.06 × 10–3 0.001 1.003 [1.001; 1.005]
   IL-32 2.60 × 10–3 0.007 1.003 [1.001; 1.005]

aThe reference category is the uninfected control group. Multivariate Logistic Regression. B, regression coefficient; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval. QFT-GIT, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; TB, tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; PHA, mitogen-induced response. Bold values, statistical significative values with a p-value under 0.05.

The combination of PHA levels of IL-10, IL-13, and IL-32 detected 11.1% of active TB cases, 50.0% of LTBI cases, and 96.4% of uninfected controls.

Discussion

This study aimed to identify promising markers to discriminate between active TB and LTBI in children. We obtained a combination based on IP-10, IFN-γ, ferritin, and 25(OH)D which showed diagnostic potential and a predictive value higher than the minimum target product profiles (TPPs) recommended.

Cytokines in M. tuberculosis Infection and Active Disease

Although IGRAs have become a standard method for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection, IFN-γ alone is unable to discriminate between TB and LTBI (Denkinger et al., 2015; Latorre and Domínguez, 2015; Pai and Behr, 2016). Previous studies showed evidence of the low sensitivity of the IGRAs in individuals with a depressed or immature immune system such as immunosuppressed patients or young children (Latorre et al., 2014). In our study, very low Ag-TB cytokine levels were found in subjects with negative QFT-GIT in comparison with those with a positive QFT-GIT. Therefore, no cytokine or combination of cytokines showed potential for the discrimination between uninfected controls and M. tuberculosis-infected children with a negative QFT-GIT result. This finding is in line with Lighter-Fisher et al., who reported that LTBI children under 5 years old showed negative QFT-GIT results and very low levels of cytokines (Lighter-Fisher et al., 2010). These results corroborate the weakened immune response of young children in protecting against M. tuberculosis and, therefore, their susceptibility to progress to TB disease. Conversely, in the present study, statistically significant differences were found between markers with potential to diagnose TB and to discriminate active TB from LTBI in M. tuberculosis-infected children with a positive QFT-GIT result.

Since children become more susceptible to developing intrathoracic and ETB disease following exposure to M. tuberculosis, several studies have examined the patterns of expression of a variety of biomarkers to understand the progression of intrathoracic and ETB disease in children (Whittaker et al., 2012). Similar to Kumar et al. (2013) in the present study no marker was able to differentiate between subjects with intrathoracic TB and ETB (Kumar et al., 2013). Although mediastinal TB subjects showed an immune profile similar to that of intrathoracic and ETB, five biomarkers (IL-17, GM-CSF, TNF-α, IL-13, and ferritin) showed potential to identify mediastinal TB subjects in the TB group. Radiographic signs of mediastinal TB have been related to the onset of primary TB in children (Thomas, 2019). Considering that TB represents a dynamic continuum of states in which the dichotomous distinction between infection and disease is often difficult to differentiate (Perez-Velez et al., 2017), the previous cytokines suggest a potential for detecting M. tuberculosis-infected children most likely to progress to the disease and/or early stages of TB.

In subjects with a positive QFT-GIT result, IP-10, IFN-γ, IL-5, and ferritin responses individually showed statistically significant differences between active TB and LTBI. However, the combination of IP-10, IFN-γ, ferritin, and 25(OH)D achieved the best diagnostic performance to discriminate between active TB and LTBI cases. IP-10 and IFN-γ play an important role in the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection (Chegou et al., 2014). Several studies have described the good performance of IP-10 when compared or combined with IFN-γ for the diagnosis of TB and the discrimination between TB and LTBI in children, respectively (Ruhwald et al., 2012; Villar-Hernandez et al., 2017). While IP-10 is a chemokine involved in the trafficking and stimulation of monocytes and Th1 cells activated in response to inflammatory foci, IFN-γ is essential for the mediation of the adaptive immune response against M. tuberculosis (Ruhwald et al., 2008). In contrast to IFN-γ, IP-10 induces a robust, specific M. tuberculosis response not influenced by age (Ruhwald et al., 2012). Indeed, according to previous studies, IP-10 shows the same kinetics as IFN-γ but at levels up to 10-fold higher (Lighter et al., 2009; Ruhwald et al., 2011).

Previous studies in M. tuberculosis-infected adults and children observed variations in cytokine responses after PHA-stimulation (Mueller et al., 2008; Ruhwald et al., 2008, 2011; Alsleben et al., 2012; Jeong et al., 2015). In our study, PHA levels of IFN-γ were significantly higher in LTBI cases compared to TB cases. Similar findings have been observed in M. tuberculosis-infected adults whose blood was stimulated with QFT-GIT peptides (Jeong et al., 2015). Therefore, PHA-induced responses were considered to evaluate host immune status for the discrimination between TB and LTBI in children. On the other hand, in this study, PHA levels of IP-10 were very similar to those obtained in M. tuberculosis-specific stimulation. In this regard, Ruhwald et al. (2008) suggested that PHA was a powerful inducer of IFN-γ. However, the same was not observed with IP-10, with which PHA levels were rather low.

In our study, IL-5 levels in unstimulated samples showed statistically significant differences between TB and LTBI cases. However, this cytokine was not consistently expressed. Studies in adults have shown the potential of IL-5 for discriminating between TB and LTBI cases (Won et al., 2017). However, the diagnostic value of IL-5 in children is relatively unknown (Armand et al., 2014).

In this study, cytokines levels were measured from supernatants remaining from QFT-GIT tubes. Recently, QuantiFERON-TB® Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), has been introduced in the new generation of QFT assay. For this new test there are two TB-specific antigen tubes, called TB1 and TB2. The TB1 tube, contains long peptides derived from ESAT-6 and CFP-10 (for this new test the peptide TB-7.7 has been removed), and it is designed to induce a specific CD4 T cells response. TB2 contains both the same long peptides of TB1 and newly designed shorter peptides to induce interferon (IFN)-g production by both CD4 and CD8 T-cells (Barcellini et al., 2016). The determination of these biomarkers could be performed using the TB1 tube from the QFT-Plus assay, since it contains almost the same relatively long peptides from M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6 y CFP-10) to mainly stimulate CD4 + T cells as those used in the QFT-GIT assay antigen tube. Although QFT-Plus does not contain the TB7.7 antigens, it has been shown that the absence of the TB7.7 antigen from the QFT-Plus does not significantly impact assay performance (Theel et al., 2018).

Individual Factors in M. tuberculosis Infection and Disease

The mechanism by which host, pathogens and extrinsic factors interact as final determinants of disease outcome and TB transmission is an active area of research (Bastos et al., 2018). In this context, we characterized a series of individual factors, among which ferritin and 25(OH)D were markers that showed potential for the discrimination between active TB and LTBI in children.

Iron is an essential cofactor for mycobacteria propagation during infection (Olakanmi et al., 2000), and successful protective host-immune response (Mainou-Fowler and Brock, 1985). It is known that acute phase proteins stimulate or inhibit their production in response to inflammatory processes such as infections. In our study, ferritin levels in LTBI cases were lower than in active TB cases. Previous findings by our group showed lower ferritin levels in children with a positive QFT-GIT at the onset of M. tuberculosis infection (Pérez-Porcuna et al., 2014). Similar studies showed higher median ferritin levels in TB adults than in the other study groups (Jacobs et al., 2016). A possible explanation for this result is that ferritin is a recognized acute phase protein in iron storage processes and is closely linked to host response in M. tuberculosis (Thom et al., 2012).

In the present study, no statistically significant differences were found in 25(OH)D alone between study groups. Vitamin D is a steroid hormone with pleiotropic actions in many body tissues and cells, including cells of the immune system (Nair et al., 2018). Several studies suggest that 25(OH)D deficiency (below 20 ng/ml) could compromise antibacterial activity and increase the risk of TB disease by preventing the initiation of immune response mediated by vitamin D (Hewison, 2012).

The analysis of 25(OH)D in combination with IP-10, IFN-γ and ferritin was found to be useful to discriminate between active TB and LTBI cases. We observed an inverse correlation between the 25(OH)D and PHA levels of IFN-γ in active TB cases in comparison to LTBI cases. In vitro studies have demonstrated how vitamin D induces innate antimicrobial responses and suppresses proinflammatory cytokine responses (Coussens et al., 2012). Likewise, Ragab et al. (2016) observed a negative association between the addition of vitamin D and PHA-induced IFN- γ levels (Nonnecke et al., 2003) suggesting the multiple mechanisms in which vitamin D is involved in the protection of the host against M. tuberculosis infection.

Promising Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Tests in Children

A recent systematic review by Togun et al. (2018) evaluated biomarkers able to diagnose TB in children. All the studies performed in QFT-GIT supernatants presented at least a combination of two markers for the discrimination of active TB and LTBI in children, demonstrating the involvement of several mechanisms mediated by different host markers in M. tuberculosis infection and disease (Togun et al., 2018).

Several studies have suggested that IL-2 and TNF-α may be reliable cytokines for the discrimination between active TB and LTBI cases in children (Lighter-Fisher et al., 2010; Gourgouillon et al., 2012). However, we did not find any significant differences in TNF-α, and IL-2 responses in unstimulated and stimulated samples were lower than the minimum concentrations detected in the standard curve of the experiment. Although our findings may not coincide with some mainly previously cited observations, direct comparisons of biomarkers among studies in children are complex due to population variability, the burden of M. tuberculosis presented in the different settings, and age variations that could affect the state of maturity of the immune response of the child.

Regarding the possible use of biomarkers in the field, considering the TPPs recommended by FIND/WHO, the sensitivity and specificity achieved by the combination of IFN-γ, IP-10, ferritin and 25(OH)D were optimal (Denkinger et al., 2015). In recent years, two case-control studies presented two models for the diagnosis of TB in children with minimal TPPs higher than those reached in this study for the development of a new diagnostic test (Armand et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2017). However, they were not able to discriminate between active TB and LTBI cases. In our study, the combination of IP-10, IFN-γ, ferritin, and 25(OH)D achieved the best diagnostic performance with correct classification of active TB cases (93.2%) and LTBI cases (90.0%). Moreover, this combination of biomarkers correctly classified 76.2% of the mediastinal TB subjects. Lastly, this combination could be a good diagnostic test to confirm active TB (LR+ = 9.32) and a very robust test to rule out cases with active TB from cases with LTBI (LR− = 0.08).

Limitations and Strengths of the Study

One limitation of the studies evaluating diagnostic tests for TB in children is the lack of a microbiological gold standard and adequate, validated clinical scoring systems, resulting in low diagnostic sensitivity in children. In this study, TST was defined as a criterion for inclusion of the screened TB and LTBI children to improve patient classification. However, the inclusion criterion mentioned above may have affected the specificity of diagnosis of some risk groups with a vulnerable immune system including malnourished children. Despite attempting to control most of the risk factors, the vulnerability of the study population and context did not allow evaluation of some factors which may affect the immune system (such as cytomegalovirus and allergies). An important strength of this study is the strict criteria for the classification of the study groups (Graham et al., 2015). It should be noted that in this case-control study, the sample size, age ranges according to sex and nutritional status were widely represented. However, according to the results obtained, additional studies are needed to validate the performance of the current model in children with other respiratory infections. The identification of these biomarkers has the same technical difficulty as performance of the QFT-GIT assay. However, the combination of biomarkers presented in this study might also have a great potential to discriminate between TB and LTBI in children. To this end, future studies should be conducted validating the identification of the biomarkers proposed in this study in other geographical areas and different populations.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest the diagnostic potential of the combination of IFN-γ, IP-10, ferritin and 25(OH)D detected in supernatants in QFT-GIT tubes for the diagnosis of pediatric TB and discrimination between TB and LTBI. In addition, these markers may be useful for the identification of the onset of primary TB, although future investigations in transversal and prospective longitudinal studies are warranted. This study highlights potential markers with optimal diagnostic accuracy for improving the management of TB diagnosis in children. Finally, developing a rapid diagnostic test based on the immunological biomarkers studied would improve the access of TB services, thereby promoting early diagnosis of pediatric TB and LTBI.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of the University of Barcelona and the Haitian National Ethics Committee (project number IRB00003099). Before participation, written informed consent was obtained from the child’s parents or guardian.

Author Contributions

PC-d-B, CA, TP-P, RA, and JD conceived and designed the study. PC-d-B, MJC, MN, and JG collected the data. PC-d-B, RV-H, RA, TP-P, IL, LCA, BSM, and JD analyzed and interpreted the data. PC-d-B, TP-P, RA, JD, and RV-H drafted the article. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff (especially Mr. Louis Yves and Ms. Achil Nancy, nurses and laboratory technicians) of the pediatric Hospital Saint Damien of the Nos Petits Frères et Soeurs Foundation, Port-au-Prince, for their unconditional support throughout this research project, and for valuable assistance and care in recruiting the patients for this study. We thank Mr. Movil Junior Wilfrid of the Ministère de la Santé Publique d’Haïti for his help during the household screening of children with a household TB contact. Finally, we also thank Dr. Jaume Ollé Goig from the ACTMON Association for his support to the TB unit of the Saint Damien Hospital that had an indirect positive influence on this project. The funders were not involved in any of the stages of the study, from its design to submission of the manuscript for publication.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by grants from: (i) the Isolana Foundation, (ii) the Maria Francisca de Roviralta Foundation expedient AT/MA 1-19/07/2017, AT/MA 70-27/04/2016, and AT/MA 3-22/10/2014, (iii) the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI-16/1912), integrated in the Plan Nacional de I+D+I and cofounded by the ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), (iv) CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya, (v) el Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya, en la convocatòria corresponent a l’any 2017 de concessió de subvencions del Pla Estratègic de Recerca i Innovació en Salut (PERIS) 2016-2020 modalitat intesificació professionals de salut expedient SLT006/17/144, and (vi) Fundació Recerca i Docència Mútua Terrassa.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01855/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Ahmadi N. A., Damraj F. A. (2009). A field evaluation of formalin-gasoline technique in the concentration of stool for detection of intestinal parasites. Parasitol. Res. 104 553–557. 10.1007/s00436-008-1229-1224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsleben N., Ruhwald M., Rüssmann H., Marx F. M., Wahn U., Magdorf K. (2012). Interferon-gamma inducible protein 10 as a biomarker for active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection in children: a case-control study. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 44 256–262. 10.3109/00365548.2011.632644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Tuberculosis (2009). Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 28th Edn Elk Grove Village, IL: AMITA Health Medical Group. [Google Scholar]
  4. Armand M., Chhor V., de Lauzanne A., Guérin-El Khourouj V., Pédron B., Jeljeli M., et al. (2014). Cytokine responses to quantiferon peptides in pediatric tuberculosis: a pilot study. J. Infect. 68 62–70. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Augustynowicz-Kopeć E., Jagielski T., Kozińska M., Kremer K., van Soolingen D., Bielecki J., et al. (2012). Transmission of tuberculosis within family-households. J. Infect. 64 596–608. 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barcellini L., Borroni E., Brown J., Brunetti E., Codecasa L., Cugnata F., et al. (2016). First independent evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Plus performance. Eur. Respir. J. 47 1587–1590. 10.1183/13993003.02033-2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bass J. R., Farer L. S., Hopewell P. C., Jacobs R. F., Snider D. E., Jr. (1990). American thoracic society. diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 142 725–735. 10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bastos H. N., Osório N. S., Gagneux S., Comas I., Saraiva M. (2018). The troika host-pathogen-extrinsic factors in tuberculosis: modulating inflammation and clinical outcomes. Front. Immunol. 8:1948. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chegou N. N., Heyckendorf J., Walzl G., Lange C., Ruhwald M. (2014). Beyond the IFN-γ horizon: biomarkers for immunodiagnosis of infection with mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. 43 1472–1486. 10.1183/09031936.00151413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coussens A. K., Wilkinson R. J., Hanifa Y., Nikolayevskyy V., Elkington P. T., Islam K., et al. (2012). Vitamin D accelerates resolution of inflammatory responses during tuberculosis treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 15449–15454. 10.1073/pnas.1200072109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Denkinger C. M., Kik S. V., Cirillo D. M., Casenghi M., Shinnick T., Weyer K., et al. (2015). Defining the needs for next generation assays for tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 211 S29–S38. 10.1093/infdis/jiu821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dodd P. J., Yuen C. M., Becerra M. C., Revill P., Jenkins H. E., Seddon J. A. (2018). Potential effect of household contact management on childhood tuberculosis: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Glob. Heal. 6 e1329–e1338. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30401-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dodd P. J., Yuen C. M., Sismanidis C., Seddon J. A., Jenkins H. E. (2017). The global burden of tuberculosis mortality in children: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Glob. Heal. 5 e898–e906. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30289-89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dominguez J., Latorre I., Altet N., Mateo L., De Souza-Galvao M., Ruiz-Manzano J., et al. (2009). IFN-gamma-release assays to diagnose TB infection in the immunocompromised individual. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 3 309–327. 10.1586/ers.09.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gourgouillon N., De Lauzanne A., Cottart C. H., Curis E., Debord C., Guérin-El Khourouj V., et al. (2012). TNF-α/IL-2 ratio discriminates latent from active tuberculosis in immunocompetent children: a pilot study. Pediatr. Res. 72 370–374. 10.1038/pr.2012.89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham S. M., Cuevas L. E., Jean-Philippe P., Browning R., Casenghi M., Detjen A. K., et al. (2015). Clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis in children: an update. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61 S179–S187. 10.1093/cid/civ581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hewison M. (2012). An update on vitamin D and human immunity. Clin. Endocrinol. 76 315–325. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04261.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ibrahim M. K., Zambruni M., Melby C. L., Melby P. C. (2017). Impact of childhood malnutrition on host defense and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 30 919–971. 10.1128/CMR.00119-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobs R., Maasdorp E., Malherbe S., Loxton A. G., Stanley K., Van Der Spuy G., et al. (2016). Diagnostic potential of novel salivary host biomarkers as candidates for the immunological diagnosis of tuberculosis disease and monitoring of tuberculosis treatment response. PLoS One 11:e0160546. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jeong Y. H., Hur Y. G., Lee H., Kim S., Cho J. E., Chang J., et al. (2015). Discrimination between active and latent tuberculosis based on ratio of antigen-specific to mitogen-induced IP-10 production. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53 504–510. 10.1128/JCM.02758-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz N., Chaves A., Pellegrino J. (1972). A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistomiasismansoni. Rev. Med. Trop. São Paulo 14 397–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar N. P., Anuradha R., Andrade B. B., Suresh N., Ganesh R., Shankar J., et al. (2013). Circulating biomarkers of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 20 704–711. 10.1128/CVI.00038-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kyu H. H., Maddison E. R., Henry N. J., Mumford J. E., Barber R., Shields C., et al. (2018). The global burden of tuberculosis: results from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18 261–284. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30703-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Latorre I., Díaz J., Mialdea I., Serra-Vidal M., Altet N., Prat C., et al. (2014). IP-10 is an accurate biomarker for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. J. Infect. 69 590–599. 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Latorre I., Domínguez J. (2015). Dormancy antigens as biomarkers of latent tuberculosis infection. EBIOM 2 790–791. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lighter J., Rigaud M., Huie M., Peng C. H., Pollack H. (2009). Chemokine IP-10: an adjunct marker for latent tuberculosis infection in children. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 13 731–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lighter-Fisher J., Peng C. H., Tse D. B. (2010). Cytokine responses to QuantiFERON§peptides, purified protein derivative and recombinant ESAT-6 in children with tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 14 1548–1555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mainou-Fowler T., Brock J. H. (1985). Effect of iron deficiency on the response of mouse lymphocytes to concanavalin a: the importance of transferrin-bound iron. Immunology 54 325–332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marais B. J., Gie R. P., Schaaf H. S., Hesseling A. C., Obihara C. C., Nelson L. J., et al. (2004). The clinical epidemiology of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis: a critical review of literature from the pre-chemotherapy era. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 8 278–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Michael F., Holick M. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 357 266–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mueller H., Detjen A. K., Schuck S. D., Gutschmidt A., Wahn U., Magdorf K., et al. (2008). Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+, IFNγ+, and TNFα+multifunctional memory T cells coexpress GM-CSF. Cytokine 43 143–148. 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nair P., Venkatesh B., Center J. R. (2018). Vitamin D deficiency and supplementation in critical illness-the known knowns and known unknowns. Crit. Care 22 1–9. 10.1186/s13054-018-2185-88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nicol M. P., Gnanashanmugam D., Browning R., Click E. S., Cuevas L. E., Detjen A., et al. (2015). A blueprint to address research gaps in the development of biomarkers for pediatric tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61 S164–S172. 10.1093/cid/civ613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nonnecke B. J., Waters W. R., Foote M. R., Horst R. L., Fowler M. A., Miller B. L. (2003). In vitro effects of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 on interferon- γ and tumor necrosis factor- α secretion by blood leukocytes from young and adult cattle Vaccinated with mycobacterium bovis BCG. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 73 235–244. 10.1024//0300-9831.73.4.235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Olakanmi O., Britigan B. E., Schlesinger L. S. (2000). Gallium disrupts iron metabolism of mycobacteria residing within human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 68 5619–5627. 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5619-5627.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pai M., Behr M. (2016). Latent mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and interferon-gamma release assays. Microbiol. Spectr. 4 1–10. 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0023-16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pérez-Porcuna T. M., Ascaso C., Malheiro A., Abellana R., Martins M., Sardinha J. F. J., et al. (2014). Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in young children: analyzing the performance of the diagnostic tests. PLoS One 9:e97992. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perez-Velez C. M., Roya-Pabon C. L., Marais B. J. (2017). A systematic approach to diagnosing intra-thoracic tuberculosis in children. J. Infect. 74 S74–S83. 10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30195-90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ragab D., Soliman D., Samaha D., Yassin A. (2016). Vitamin D status and its modulatory effect on interferon gamma and interleukin-10 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in culture. Cytokine 85 5–10. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruhwald M., Aabye M. G., Ravn P. (2012). IP-10 release assays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection: current status and future directions. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 12 175–187. 10.1586/erm.11.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ruhwald M., Bodmer T., Maier C., Jepsen M., Haaland M. B., Eugen-Olsen J., et al. (2008). Evaluating the potential of IP-10 and MCP-2 as biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. 32 1607–1615. 10.1183/09031936.00055508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruhwald M., Dominguez J., Latorre I., Losi M., Richeldi L., Pasticci M. B., et al. (2011). A multicentre evaluation of the accuracy and performance of IP-10 for the diagnosis of infection with M. tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 91 260–267. 10.1016/j.tube.2011.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Theel E. S., Hilgart H., Breen-Lyles M., McCoy K., Flury R., Breeher L. E., et al. (2018). Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB gold plus and QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube interferon gamma release assays in patients at risk for tuberculosis and in health care workers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56 1–12. 10.1128/JCM.00614-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thom R. E., Elmore M. J., Williams A., Andrews S. C., Drobniewski F., Marsh P. D., et al. (2012). The expression of ferritin, lactoferrin, transferrin receptor and solute carrier family 11A1 in the host response to BCG-vaccination and mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge. Vaccine 30 3159–3168. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas T. A. (2019). Tuberculosis in children. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 29 109–121. 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2018.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Togun T. O., MacLean E., Kampmann B., Pai M. (2018). Biomarkers for diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis: a systematic review. PLoS One 13 1–19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0204029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Velasco-Arnaiz E., Soriano-Arandes A., Latorre I., Altet N., Dominguez J., Fortuny C., et al. (2018). Performance of tuberculin skin tests and interferon-gamma release assays in children younger than 5 years. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 37 1235–1241. 10.1097/INF.0000000000002015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Villar-Hernandez R., Latorre I., Minguez S., Diaz J., Garcia-Garcia E., Muriel-Moreno B., et al. (2017). Use of IFN-gamma and IP-10 detection in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. J. Infect. 75 315–325. 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Whittaker E., Jones C., Kampmann B. (2012). TB in children. Eur. Respir. Monogr. 58 206–218. [Google Scholar]
  50. Won E. J., Choi J. H., Cho Y. N., Jin H. M., Kee H. J., Park Y. W., et al. (2017). Biomarkers for discrimination between latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis disease. J. Infect. 74 281–293. 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. World Health Organization [WHO] (2009). AnthroPlus for Personal Computers Manual: Software for Assessing Growth of the World’s Children and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  52. World Health Organization [WHO] (2013). Guideline: Updates on the Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. World Health Organization (2017). Consensus Meeting Report: Development of a Target Product Profile (TPP) and a Framework for Evaluation for a Test for Predicting Progression from Tuberculosis Infection to Active Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  54. World Health Organization [WHO] (2018a). Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  55. World Health Organization [WHO] (2018b). Roadmap Towards Ending TB in Children and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou Y., Du J., Hou H.-Y., Lu Y.-F., Yu J., Mao L.-Y., et al. (2017). Application of immunoscore model for the differentiation between active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection as well as monitoring anti-tuberculosis therapy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7 1–11. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES