Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2019 Mar 5;50(5):952–966. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.02.003

Table 3.

Multiple Linear Regressions Predicting High PTSD Class vs. Dissociative Subtype Posterior Probability Scores

DSPS Posterior
Probability Scores:
High PTSD
DSPS Posterior
Probability
Scores:
Dissociative
Variable β ΔR2 β ΔR2
Step 1 (Both Models) .000 .096***
 Age .014 −.079
 Sex .014 −.293***
Model 1
Step 2 .312*** .078**
 EID .382*** .104
 THD .226** .244**
 BXD .116 −.159
Model 2
Step 2 .340*** .134**
 RCd .415** −.237
 RC1 .167 .012
 RC2 −.124 .291*
 RC3 −.010 −.105
 RC4 .118 −.096
 RC6 .118 −.002
 RC7 .021 .091
 RC8 .080 .308**
 RC9 −.073 .020

Note. The interview version of the DSPS was analyzed to maximize sample size. DSPS = Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale; H-O = Higher-Order; EID = Emotional/Internalizing Dysfunction; THD = Thought Dysfunction; BXD = Behavioral/Externalizing Dysfunction; RC = Restructured Clinical; RCd = Demoralization; RC1 = Somatic Complaints; RC2 = Low Positive Emotions; RC3 = Cynicism; RC4 = Antisocial Behavior; RC6 = Ideas of Persecution; RC7 = Dysfunctional Negative Emotions; RC8 = Aberrant Experiences; RC9 = Hypomanic Activation;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

Step 1 was identical for models 1 and 2, so is only displayed once in the table.