Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 25;32(17):5810–5820. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6169-11.2012

Table 1.

Development of escape onset latency

Hours postfertilization
45–59 60–74 75–89 90–104 105–170
Average latency
    Intact 6.8 ± 0.9 ms 6.1 ± 1.0 ms 5.3 ± 1.2 ms 6.6 ± 2.3 ms 4.7 ± 2.3 ms
n = 47, 4 fish n = 101, 10 fish n = 160, 13 fish n = 41, 4 fish n = 124, 12 fish
    OV-lesioned 6.6 ± 0.8 ms 6.4 ± 1.3 ms 7.0 ± 1.1 ms 7.9 ± 1.7 ms 8.9 ± 1.7 ms
n = 45, 5 fish n = 47, 7 fish n = 41, 5 fish n = 43, 5 fish n = 48, 11 fish
    M-lesioned 7.3 ± 1.0 ms 8.1 ± 0.7 ms 7.5 ± 0.6 ms 8.0 ± 1.1 ms 8.5 ± 1.6 ms
n = 29, 3 fish n = 27, 3 fish n = 33, 3 fish n = 24, 3 fish n = 40, 5 fish
Minimum latency
    Intact 5.8 ± 1.0 ms 5.1 ± 0.7 ms 4.0 ± 0.8 ms 4.4 ± 0.9 ms 3.0 ± 0.0 ms
    OV-lesioned 5.6 ± 0.5 ms 5.6 ± 1.1 ms 6.0 ± 0.7 ms 6.4 ± 0.5 ms 7.8 ± 1.1 ms
    M-lesioned 6.3 ± 0.6 ms 7.7 ± 0.6 ms 6.7 ± 0.6 ms 7.0 ± 0.0 ms 7.4 ± 1.1 ms

Average and minimum onset latencies of tail flip responses elicited by a water pulse delivered to the OV of intact, OV-lesioned, or M-lesioned larvae in semifixed preparations, at different developmental stages. Values are reported as mean ± SD.