Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD006413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006413.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Agampodi 2008 Before and after study ‐ no control
Armstrong 2004 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Ashworth 2005 Systematic review. Not a supervision study ‐ physical activity programmes for older people
Bang 1994 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Bang 1999 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of female health workers
Bradley 2005 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of COPE, a problem‐solving approach for health staff
Brewster 1997 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Chalker 2001 Study methods: longitudinal study ‐ no control
Chinbuah 2006 Before and after study ‐ no control
Chopra 2005 Before and after study ‐ no control. Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect on IMCI
Chukwujekwu 2010 Before and after study ‐ no control
Comolet 1997 Before and after study ‐ no control
Conteh 2010 Supervision of treatments in the context of a RCT
Curtale 1995 Study type: survey. Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
De Jong 1996 Descriptive/qualitative study. Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Dehne 1995 Study type: survey
Delacollette 1996 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of lay health workers
Delgado 1983 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of clinical follow‐up of children
Di Sorbo 2010 Observational study
Dolo 2010 Supervision of laboratory diagnostic procedures
Dumont 2005 Before and after study ‐ no control
Edginton 1999 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Fauveau 1991 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of midwives
Floyd 2003 Before and after study without control. Not a supervision study ‐ supervision relates to DOTS treatment of patients, not PHC staff
Frazao 2009 Not an intervention study
Ghoneim 2004 Before and after study ‐ no control. Not a supervision study ‐ refers to nursery staff as "supervisors"
Giugliani 2010 One rural health facility receiving the intervention without control
Grosskurth 1995 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Grosskurth 2000 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Hayes 2005 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Hidalgo 1997 Not a supervision study ‐ looking at the effect of organisational environment
Hill 2000 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of primary health care
Htay 2003 Study type: survey
Irawati 2007 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Jacquier 2000 Before and after study ‐ no control
Janowitz 2000 Descriptive study
Jaramillo 2001 Before and after study ‐ no control
Jin 1993 North Korea ‐ high income country
Kafle 2009 Visits to district capital. No supervision intervention
Katabarwa 2005 Study type: survey
Kelly 2001 Before and after study ‐ no control
Kim 2002 Technical supervision to improve communication skills. Supervision does not include management activity and not from a higher tier of health services.
Kirkwood 2010 No supervision intervention
Lamboray 1979 Study method: case study, narrative with no data
Libamba 2006 Study method: audit ‐ no control
Libamba 2007 Descriptive study
Lofmark 2010 Context of nursing education
Lynch 1994 Study type: survey
Maung 2006 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect of training general practitioners and improving laboratory testing for TB
Mogassale 2010 Time series without pre‐intervention data
Osterholt 2006 Study type: survey
PAHO 1999 Not an intervention study
PAHO 1999a Not an intervention study
PAHO 2005 Not an intervention study
Powell 1989 Not a supervision study ‐ looking at effect of home visits
Rao 1998 Not a supervision study ‐ examines the effect different drug delivery systems
Reynolds 2008 Study related to on‐site supervision, not outreach supervisory visits
Ronsmans 2001 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Roos 1995 Study method: survey
Ross 2007 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Sujpluem 1981 Not an intervention study
Thiam 2007 Multiple interventions, unable to disentangle the effects of supervision
Tirado 1990 Study method: survey
Wasunna 2010 Training intervention
Wesson 2008 'Detailing' intervention
Zenni 1996 American study ‐ high income country. Not primary health care ‐ hospital based.

DOTS: Directly Observed Treatment, Short course
 IMCI: Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses 
 PHC: primary health care
 RCT: randomised controlled trial
 TB: tuberculosis