Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;39(34):6668–6683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0159-19.2019

Table 3.

Spatial tuning properties

Selective n (%) Unimodal n (%) Tuning width median (IQR) Tuning strength
ROCi mean (SEM) Norm GLM coefficients mean (SEM)
Choice-target tuninga
    ACC 28/102 (27.5%) 22 (78.6%) 167° (154°,171°) 0.645 (0.020) 1.745 (0.290)
    PCC 131/235 (55.7%) 98 (74.8%) 161° (150°,170°) 0.689 (0.010) 2.311 (0.156)
    ACC versus PCC (all neurons) p < 0.001 (rank-sum = 19,533) p < 0.001 (rank-sum = 13,465) p < 0.001 (rank-sum = 13,343)
    ACC versus PCC (selective neurons) p = 0.167 (rank-sum = 2546) p = 0.055 (rank-sum = 1815) p = 0.042 (rank-sum = 1789)
Reward-target tuningb
    ACC 27/102 (26.5%) 18 (66.7%) 167° (163°,172°) 0.578 (0.012) 1.188 (0.145)
    PCC 103/235 (43.8%) 74 (71.8%) 163° (150°,170°) 0.630 (0.009) 1.584 (0.126)
    ACC versus PCC (all neurons) p = 0.067 (rank-sum = 18,743 p = 0.003 (rank-sum = 14,771) p = 0.020 (rank-sum = 15,114)
    ACC versus PCC (selective neurons) p = 0.143 (rank-sum = 2024) p = 0.002 (rank-sum = 1235) p = 0.324 (rank-sum = 1596)

aChoice-target tuning computed for postsaccade epoch.

bReward-target tuning computed for feedback epoch.