Table 2.
Three different categories of clinical situations were extracted from the analyses based on the 75% cutoff point of the similarity in decision making
| Categories based on the 75% cutoff point | Case reference | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical situations in which ≥75% of dentists decided that cuspal coverage is needed | ||
| Case V1 (m) | 95 | |
| Case E1 (m) | 88.3 | |
| Case V2 (m) | 76.6 | |
| Clinical situations in which <75% of dentists made similar decisions on whether cuspal coverage is needed or not | ||
| Case E2 (m) | 71.7 “needs cuspal coverage” | |
| Case E2 (p) | 51.7 “needs cuspal coverage” | |
| Case V3 (m) | 66.7 “needs cuspal coverage” | |
| Case V3 (p) | 55.0 “does not need cuspal coverage” | |
| Case V4 (m) | 56.7 “needs cuspal coverage” | |
| Case V4 (p) | 53.3 “needs cuspal coverage” | |
| Clinical situations in which ≥75% of the dentists decided that cuspal coverage is needed | ||
| Case E3 (m) | 75.0 | |
| Case E3 (p) | 96.7 | |
| Case E4 (m) | 88.3 | |
| Case E5 (m) | 98.3 | |