. 2019 Aug 21;9:12143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48613-3

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic and clinical parameters between groups.

Parameters	Unilateral amblyopic children		Controls	p-value^a	p-value^b	p-value^c	p-value^d
Parameters	Amblyopic eyes	Fellow eyes	Controls	p-value^a	p-value^b	p-value^c	p-value^d
No. eyes (patients)	32 (32)	32 (32)	38 (19)
Age, years, mean ± SD (range)	6.9 ± 2.9 (3–12)		7.3 ± 2.3 (3–16)	0.607	0.233	0.233
Male, n (%)	15 (47)		14 (37)	0.403
Refractive error, D, mean ± SD	4.16 ± 1.97	2.32 ± 2.37	−0.75 ± 1.35	0.039**	<0.001*	<0.001*	<0.001*
BCVA, LogMAR, mean ± SD	0.30 ± 0.22	0.13 ± 0.24	0.02 ± 0.05	<0.001**	<0.001*	0.014	<0.001*
Axial length, mm, mean ± SD	21.28 ± 1.05	22.25 ± 0.87	23.38 ± 0.79	<0.001**	<0.001*	<0.001*	0.002*

SD: standard deviation; D: diopter; BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR: minimal angle of logarithm. ^aKruskal Wallis test between Amblyopic eyes, fellow eyes, and controls. ^bMann-Whitney test between amblyopic eyes and controls. ^cMann-Whitney test between fellow eyes and controls. ^dMann-Whitney test between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes. *Statistically significant p-value.