Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;2:80. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0159-0

Table 4.

Accuracy of JVP characterization compared to right heart catheterization

Categorya Observed Expected Pearson’s χ2 p value
Bedside exam
 Agree 20 16 1.625 0.44
 Disagree by 1 15 16
 Disagree by 2 13 16
Unamplified
Agree 13 16 4.625 0.10
Disagree by 1 23 16
Disagree by 2 12 16
Amplified
Agree 17 16 11.375 0.0034
Disagree by 1 25 16
Disagree by 2 6 16

JVP jugular venous pressure

a“Agreement” achieved if the assessment categorization was the same as right heart catheterization (e.g., both “borderline”); “disagree by 1” noted if there was a one-category discrepancy (e.g., “normal” and “borderline”); “disagree by 2” noted if there was a two-category discrepancy (e.g., “normal” and “elevated”). Expected values assume a random frequency distribution across categories

Bold value indicate statistical significance