Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 18;195(9):780–791. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01480-3

Table 5.

Results of the volumetric assessments of lymph nodes volumes (nodal gross tumor volume, nGTV) obtained from computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MRI) and 18-fluorine-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG–PET) images in each patient (1–10)

No. of pt nGTV CT cm3 nGTV MRI cm3 (%) nGTV PET vis vis cm3 (%) nGTV PET20% cm3 (%) nGTV PET30% cm3 (%) nGTV PET40% cm3 (%) nGTV PET50% cm3 (%)
1 4 9.14 (228.5) 5.07 (126.7) 3.62 (90.5) 2.36 (59) 1.61 (40.3) 1.02 (22.5)
1.56 3.54 0
2.11 4.31 0
1.59 0 0
2 0 4.18 2.35
4.19 4.13 (98.6) 1.34 (32) 10.37 (247.5) 8.68 (207.2) 6.15 (146.8) 3.56 (85)
1.52 2.42 (159.2) 0.39 (59.3) 8.54 (561.8) 5.54 (364.5) 3.16 (207.9) 2.02 (132.9)
1.43 0 0
3 5.8 2.11 (36.4) 0.77 (13.3) 3.94 (68) 2.14 (36.9) 0.99 (17.1) 0.44 (7.6)
2.27 2.55 0
0.78 1.46 0
0 0 0.47
4 5.3 8.09 (152.6) 4.9 (92.5) 23.13 (436.4) 9.26 (174.7) 5.54 (104.5) 3.26 (61.5)
1.8 3.01 (162.2) 1.6 (88.8) 9.66 (536.7) 7.76 (431.1) 4.55 (252.8) 2.23 (123.9)
0.65 0 1.5
0.67 0 0
0.4 0 0
5 5.6 6.2 (110.7) 2.5 (44.6) 5.14 (91.8) 2.31 (41.25) 1.27 (22.7) 0.69 (12.3)
1.9 3.46 (182.1) 0.6 (31.6) 4.41 (232.1) 3.13 (164.7) 1.78 (93.7 ) 1.01 (53.2)
0 1.48 0.8
0 1.2 0
1.38 0 0
6 0 0 0
7 0 0 0
8 1.06 2.14 (201.9) 0.88 (83) 2.57 (242.5) 1.76 (166) 1.03 (97.2 ) 0.59 (55.7)
2.58 2.06 (79.8) 0.69 (26.7) 3.49 (135.3) 1.48 (57.4) 0.73 (28.3) 0.38 (14.7)
9 0.86 1.14 0
1.2 1.67 0
10 0 1.98 0.69

italicized volumes of lymph nodes detected with every of three imaging methods: CT, MRI and PET, italic bold values of PET-based volumes obtained from fixed threshold method, which are the most closely related to CT-based volumes

% percentage of CT-based volume, PET vis visual method, PET20%/PET30%/PET40%/PET50% fixed threshold method, pts patients