Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;9:12207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48226-w

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of clinical outpatient vs. operating room tissue collection.

Considerations Outpatient Clinic OR/Surgical Resection
Patient report (+) More relaxed atmosphere; Patients are more willing to listen to ongoing research efforts, ask questions, etc. (−) Patients are usually anxious about surgery and less willing to engage in conversation/ questions asked about the disease
Collection of tissue samples

(+) Patients will be more willing to provide smaller tissue sections for research biospecimens

(+) Allows for biopsies of lesional, perilesional, and unaffected tissue all from the same patient

(−) Tissue section size will be limited/smaller (approx. 2-4 mm)

(+) Surgical removal of tissue is both therapeutic and allows for research biospecimens (-) More difficult to collect various tissue sections

(+) Larger tissue sections

Healing time (+) Smaller biopsies can be sutured for faster healing (−) Open wounds require longer healing time and increase the risk of post-surgical infections
Collection of other biospecimens (+) Very feasible to collect samples including saliva (−) Usually not feasible, especially considering coordination needed with OR team.
Time (−) If the clinic schedule is delayed, patients are less willing to participate (−) The OR schedule can be delayed
Anatomy/Structure of lesions (−) Only allows for surface examination of the lesions (+) Allows full visualization of the anatomic location of lesions, including epithelization, sinus tracts, etc.
Cost (+) Less expensive (−) More expensive