Table 3.
ROIs showing differential activation across ER task conditions at pre-traininga
| Brain region | L/R | Neutral, mean (SD) | Attend, mean (SD) | Regulate | Attend > Neutral, p (η2) | Regulate > Attend, p (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial PFC | L | 0.16 (0.35) | 0.27 (0.39) | 0.29 (0.30) | <0.05 (0.17) | |
| R | 0.11 (0.30) | 0.20 (0.25) | 0.21 (0.26) | <0.05 (0.18) | ||
| Lateral PFC (middle frontal) | L | 0.11 (0.27) | 0.17 (0.29) | 0.27 (0.30) | <0.05 (0.13) | |
| R | 0.12 (0.30) | 0.22 (0.34) | 0.38 (0.26) | <0.01 (0.23) | ||
| OFC | L | 0.03 (0.30) | 0.11 (0.31) | 0.14 (0.24) | <0.05 (0.14) | |
| R | 0.10 (0.32) | 0.16 (0.36) | 0.25 (0.31) | <0.05 (0.13) | ||
| Inferior parietal cortex | L | 0.18 (0.36) | 0.25 (0.40) | 0.38 (0.35) | <0.05 (0.15) | |
| R | 0.23 (0.32) | 0.28 (0.35) | 0.35 (0.31) | <0.05 (0.14) |
aBOLD activation in the a priori specified ROIs across the different ER conditions. None of the other ROIs showed a significant effect of condition.