Skip to main content
. 2013 May 22;33(21):9176–9183. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0055-13.2013

Table 1.

Resting-state ECM analysis: results of paired t tests

Region kE Z value x y z
Dual versus sham
    L middle frontal gyrus 31 3.81 −38 42 26
    L superior/middle frontal gyrus 33 3.43 −17 18 50
    L dorsal posterior cingulate cortex 61 3.76 0 −36 26
    R frontal operculum/insula 38 −4.46 46 −3 15
    R parietal operculum/insula 46 −3.51 43 −18 20
    R hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus 44 −4.45 17 −24 −10
    Culmen (cerebellum) 39 −3.68 0 −48 −2
Anodal versus sham
    L caudate nucleus 41 4.71 −17 27 9
    L middle occipital/fusiform gyrus 34 3.57 −38 −60 −2
    L middle/inferior frontal gyrus 73 3.40 −49 45 1
    R precentral gyrus (somatosensory) 45 −3.78 17 −27 64
    R hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus 33 −3.69 14 −24 −10
    R middle/inferior temporal gyrus 35 −3.52 49 −39 6
    R precuneus 87 −3.47 6 −66 28
Dual versus anodal
    L dorsal posterior cingulate cortex 35 3.46 −6 −30 31
    Culmen (cerebellum) 61 −3.70 −3 −63 −2

Location and size of clusters with significantly increased (positive Z values) or decreased (negative Z values) Eigenvector centrality contrasting the tDCS conditions.

kE = cluster extent (number of voxels); x-y-z = coordinates of peak voxels in Talairach space.