Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 21;36(38):9843–9858. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-16.2016

Table 2.

Performance on neuropsychological screening tests for controls and for patients with PFC damagea

Group Posner Cueing (uncued–cued) left/right (ms) Circle cancellation % missed (left/right) Circle cancellation % false alarms Fluency: animals Fluency: F Backwards digit span Incidental memory P (Correct) Sentence comprehension P (Correct)
Control (N = 21) 81.2 (37.8)/54.2 (34.5)
DMF (N = 10) 77.6 (59.5)/72.8 (49.9) 0.4 (0.8)/1.1 (2.4) 0.06 (0.2) 19.1 (8.6) 8.9 (5.8)* 2.3 (1.3) 0.78 (0.13) 0.99 (0.88–1.00)
LLF (N = 7) 65.9 (31.4)/86.8 (32.0) 0.5 (1.0)/ 0.7 (1.2) 0.71 (1.9) 17.8 (7.9)b 8.2 (3.7)b* 2.7 (1.2) 0.81 (0.12) 0.96 (0.83–1.00)
RLF (N = 6 50.6 (56.3)/32.8 (39.0) 1.7 (2.9)/1.0 (2.0) 0.31 (0.5) 22.0 (2.7) 14.5 (3.6) 2.8 (1.2) 0.82 (0.11) 0.95 (0.77–1.00)
VMF (N = 17) 72.8 (37.5)/ 57.2 (37.5) 1.6 (2.0)/1.9 (2.7)b 0.08 (0.2) 17.7 (3.5)c 10.2 (4.4)c* 3.2 (1.3) 0.85 (0.11) 0.95 (0.77–1.00)

aValues represent means with standard deviations in parentheses, except for sentence comprehension where the median and range are given instead.

bData missing from one patient.

cData missing from two patients.

*P ≤ 0.05, against RLF two-tailed t test, uncorrected.

∧Montreal patients mostly.