Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;36(39):10198–10213. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2305-15.2016

Table 1.

Pretest and posttest performance and the effect sizes for pretest and posttest comparisons in the training group and the active and passive control groups in each task

Task Training group
Active control group
Passive control group
Pretest Posttest d Pretest Posttest d Pretest Posttest d
Dual n-back in mean achieved n-back levela 2.68 (0.53) 4.74 (1.05) 2.48 2.45 (0.56) 3.67 (0.83) 1.72 2.59 (0.73) 2.98 (0.87) 0.49
Single n-back in mean achieved n-back level
    Auditory 3.32 (0.48) 4.18 (0.47) 1.81 3.06 (0.61) 4.27 (0.36) 2.42 3.32 (0.56) 3.53 (0.50) 0.40
    Visual 3.62 (0.43) 4.17 (0.36) 1.39 3.31 (0.56) 4.23 (0.46) 1.80 3.46 (0.62) 3.64 (0.48) 0.32
Dual WM updatingb performance in trials correct 2.06 (1.35) 3.67 (1.75) 1.03 1.50 (1.15) 1.89 (2.05) 0.23 1.35 (1.32) 1.71 (2.11) 0.20
Single WM updatingb performance in trials correct
    Auditory 5.00 (2.09) 6.39 (1.75) 0.72 5.00 (2.52) 6.11 (2.22) 0.47 4.82 (2.04) 6.18 (1.70) 0.72
    Visual 3.94 (2.26) 5.06 (2.04) 0.52 4.11 (2.05) 5.56 (1.54) 0.80 4.12 (2.18) 4.88 (1.58) 0.40

Data are shown as means (SD).

aTraining group includes 17 participants in the dual n-back task.

bPassive control group includes 17 participants in the WM updating tasks.