Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;38(16):3988–4005. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2350-17.2018

Table 5.

Behavioral measures (mean + SEM) of the visual 5-CSRTT obtained during LFP data collection

Behavioral measure TD = 1 s TD = 0.5 s TD = 0.25 s Variable ITI
Correct response, %
    Control 73.96 ± 2.50 65.00 ± 3.93 55.42 ± 3.74 65.63 ± 3.60
    Saporin 69.81 ± 5.11 39.63 ± 4.81* 27.04 ± 3.70* 63.95 ± 1.51
Incorrect response, %
    Control 3.54 ± 0.86 8.75 ± 1.80 12.71 ± 3.49 5.21 ± 1.46
    Saporin 5.56 ± 0.83 11.85 ± 1.87 13.70 ± 2.40 6.48 ± 1.19
Omission, %
    Control 20.42 ± 2.55 19.58 ± 3.19 16.67 ± 2.36 15.21 ± 2.88
    Saporin 21.85 ± 4.96 37.22 ± 5.31* 41.11 ± 5.73* 19.63 ± 3.67
Premature response, %
    Control 1.67 ± 0.55 6.46 ± 1.49 15.21 ± 2.68 13.75 ± 4.49
    Saporin 2.41 ± 0.40 10.56 ± 2.91 18.15 ± 5.09 17.35 ± 4.71
Correct latency, s
    Control 1.06 ± 0.04 0.99 ± 0.04 0.99 ± 0.06 1.10 ± 0.07
    Saporin 1.12 ± 0.04 1.06 ± 0.08 1.04 ± 0.07 1.09 ± 0.07
Reward latency, s
    Control 1.52 ± 0.05 1.64 ± 0.09 1.51 ± 0.07 1.57 ± 0.10
    Saporin 1.55 ± 0.08 1.47 ± 0.05 1.52 ± 0.08 1.44 ± 0.08
Accuracy, %
    Control 95.45 ± 1.59 87.68 ± 4.16 81.55 ± 4.01 92.52 ± 1.26
    Saporin 92.28 ± 1.12 75.14 ± 4.86 65.20 ± 6.91 90.97 ± 1.94

Summary of the rats' performance on a visual version of the 5-CSRTT across different testing conditions, obtained during LFP data collection. Note the significant group differences in the percentage of correct responses and percentage of omissions per session under the conditions of increased attentional demand.

*Reflects group difference at p < 0.05.