Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;38(16):3988–4005. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2350-17.2018

Table 6.

Behavioral measures (mean + SEM) of the olfactory 5-CSRTT obtained during LFP data collection

Behavioral measure TD = 1 s TD = 0.5 s TD = 0.25 s Variable ITI
Correct response, %
    Control 73.13 ± 4.89 63.54 ± 4.58 50.63 ± 2.99 62.29 ± 3.20
    Saporin 68.52 ± 4.75 44.63 ± 2.50* 26.85 ± 2.61* 64.44 ± 2.72
Incorrect response, %
    Control 4.58 ± 1.36 6.67 ± 1.89 11.25 ± 2.35 6.88 ± 1.90
    Saporin 9.07 ± 1.62 12.96 ± 2.30 10.19 ± 2.11 6.85 ± 1.13
Omission, %
    Control 17.29 ± 5.48 17.71 ± 3.48 24.17 ± 3.85 17.29 ± 4.00
    Saporin 15.00 ± 4.27 27.78 ± 4.18 50.74 ± 5.61* 17.04 ± 2.57
Premature response, %
    Control 4.38 ± 2.02 12.08 ± 3.03 13.96 ± 2.52 13.54 ± 3.89
    Saporin 7.04 ± 1.61 14.63 ± 2.45 12.22 ± 2.66 11.67 ± 2.08
Correct latency, s
    Control 1.07 ± 0.07 1.08 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.04 1.07 ± 0.05
    Saporin 1.01 ± 0.05 1.05 ± 0.09 0.87 ± 0.07 0.95 ± 0.07
Reward latency, s
    Control 1.58 ± 0.09 1.57 ± 0.07 1.48 ± 0.06 1.50 ± 0.08
    Saporin 1.50 ± 0.07 1.43 ± 0.06 1.44 ± 0.07 1.53 ± 0.06
Accuracy, %
    Control 93.99 ± 2.57 89.77 ± 4.17 82.00 ± 3.22 90.07 ± 2.27
    Saporin 87.77 ± 2.16 78.21 ± 3.01 73.17 ± 2.94 90.38 ± 1.87

Summary of the rats' performance on an olfactory version of the 5-CSRTT across different testing conditions, obtained during LFP data collection. Note the significant group differences in the percentage of correct responses and percentage of omissions per session under the conditions of increased attentional demand.

*Reflects group difference at p < 0.05.