Table 2.

Pairwise F_ST among littoral‐DRM habitats, deep‐DRM habitats, and nearshore Lake Michigan sites

	N. Lake MI	Littoral Charlevoix	Littoral Betsie	Littoral Arcadia	Littoral Portage	Littoral Manistee	Littoral Pere Marquette	Littoral Pentwater	Deep Pentwater	Littoral White	Deep White	Littoral Muskegon	Deep Muskegon	Littoral Macatawa
Littoral Charlevoix	0.008*	–
Littoral Betsie	0.019*	0.015*	–
Littoral Arcadia	0.022*	0.022*	0.008*	–
Littoral Portage	0.025*	0.027*	0.014*	0.009*	–
Littoral Manistee	0.032*	0.028*	0.016*	0.009*	0.020*	–
Littoral Pere Marquette	0.018*	0.017*	0.014*	0.011*	0.024*	0.017*	–
Littoral Pentwater	0.030*	0.030*	0.022*	0.023*	0.031*	0.020*	0.021*	–
Deep Pentwater		0.022*	0.024*	0.024*	0.028*	0.034*	0.025*	0.027*	–
Littoral White	0.027*	0.025*	0.016*	0.011*	0.021*	0.015*	0.010*	0.011*	0.031*	–
Deep White		0.028*	0.028*	0.027*	0.031*	0.031*	0.028*	0.024*	0.001	0.032*	–
Littoral Muskegon	0.030*	0.027*	0.011*	0.007*	0.018*	0.010*	0.009*	0.014*	0.032*	0.006*	0.030*	–
Deep Muskegon		0.025*	0.027*	0.027*	0.032*	0.029*	0.026*	0.028*	0.000	0.032*	−0.001	0.031*	–
Littoral Macatawa	0.022*	0.020*	0.018*	0.016*	0.027*	0.019*	0.007*	0.019*	0.029*	0.011*	0.029*	0.009*	0.030*	–
S. Lake MI	0.008*	0.035*	0.037*	0.043*	0.043*	0.053*	0.043*	0.041*		0.049*		0.051*		0.046*

All values represent pairwise F _ST scores, and values with * are statistically significant (p < 0.05) after Holm–Bonferroni sequential correction. Outlined values show comparisons between Lake Michigan and deep‐DRM. Dark highlighted values represent comparisons between deep and littoral habitats in the same DRM, and light highlighted values represent comparisons between deep habitats among DRMs.