Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Mar 26;64(9):2489–2496. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05587-6

Table 1.

Detailed characteristics of included randomized trials comparing mailed outreach with usual care for colorectal cancer screening

Study Test Type Telephone Reminder Majority Underserved Population # Allocated, Usual Care # Allocated, Mailed Outreach Mean Age, Usual Care (SD) Mean Age, Mailed Outreach (SD) # Female, Usual Care (%) # Female Mailed Outreach (%) Screening Completion Usual Care (%) Screening Completion, Mailed Outreach (%)
Singal, 2016(18) FIT Yes Yes 1199 2400 56 (4) 56 (4) 744 (62%) 1474(61%) 355 (30%) 1410 (59%)
Gupta, 2013(19) FIT Yes Yes 3898 1593 59 (3) 59 (3) 2517 (65%) 993 (62%) 471 (12%) 648 (41%)
Jean-Jacques, 2012**(20) gFOBT Yes Yes 98 104 60 (8) 60 (7) 58 (59%) 67 (64%) 15 (15%) 40 (38%)
Coronado, 2011(21) gFOBT No Yes 167 168 Unknown Unknown 88 (53%) 89 (53%) 4 (2%) 43 (26%)
Goldberg, 2004(22) gFOBT No Yes 60 59 64 64 46 (77%) 42 (71%) 3 (5%) 24 (41%)
Goldman, 2015(23) FIT Yes Yes 210 210 57 (6) 58 (6) 138 (66%) 139 (66%) 47 (22%) 84 (40%)
Green, 2013(24) gFOBT No No 1166 1169 Unknown Unknown 653 (56%) 629 (54%) 301 (26%) 659 (56%)
**

primary outcome data was for screening at 4 month follow up, but since data for 12 month follow up were provided, study was included and 12 month outcome data were abstracted for analysis; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; gFOBT, guaiac fecal occult blood test