Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;9:730. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00730

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Meta-analysis on safety. (A–F) shown the comparisons and meta-analysis on safety between CHM-WM group and WM group. The I2 statistic described the percentage of total variation across studies that was due to heterogeneity rather than chance. CI indicated the confidence interval. Dichotomous data were presented as pooled Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).