Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 22;20:384. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2

Table 3.

Number of patients in sagittal, axial, and rib cage type groups in stable and progressed subgroups. The odds ratios of progression in types 1 compared to types 2 and the 95% confidence intervals are shown

Type Stable, n = 31 Progressed, n = 14 Odds ratios

Sagittal

Type

1

2

20

11

6

8

0.41, 95% CI

[0.11–1.50]

Axial

Type

1

2

18

13

9

5

1.4, 95% CI

[0.35–4.80]

Rib cage

Type

1

2

17

14

5

9

0.46, 95% CI

[0.12–1.68]