Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;10:3837. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11402-7

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kinetic asymmetry and Michaelis–Menten enzymes. a Energy profile for a Michaelis–Menten mechanism for catalysis, and two equivalent ways of writing the mechanism. An important quantity for determining the non-equilibrium behavior of the enzyme is the difference in transition state free-energies, ΔG=G1-G2, which can be expressed in terms of the rate constants as k-1k+2=e-ΔG. This ratio does not depend on either μ or Δμ. b Bar graphs illustrating the equilibrium (Δμ=0) distribution, where the kinetic asymmetry k+2k-1 has no role, and the non-equilibrium (Δμ=5) steady-state distributions that strongly depend on the kinetic asymmetry k+2k-1. c, d The concentrations of substrate (S) and product (P) are taken as constant (i.e., chemo-stated) in all calculations, and can be written in terms of the chemical potential using activity coefficients [S]=aSeμ+Δμ and [P]=aPeμ-Δμ. In ideal solutions both activity coefficients are ~ 1 in the units of concentration in which [S] and [P] are specified. Two types of enzyme adaptation: c “equilibrium” adaptation where the binding is based on the reference chemical potential μ-ΔG0,ΔG0=(GEL0-GE0), with k-1=5, k+2=0.2, and Δμ=3.4 (orange); Δμ=0 (green); and Δμ=-3.4 (blue). d Non-equilibrium adaptation governed by Δμ plotted at fixed μ-ΔG0=0. The binding is controlled by Δμ and by the kinetic asymmetry (k+2k-1=25(blue);k+2k-1=1(green);andk+2k-1=0.04(orange))