TABLE 3.
Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
---|---|---|
Silver, no cost-sharing reduction | Reference | Reference |
Bronze | 1.05 (0.016)** | 1.07 (0.020)*** |
Silver, cost-sharing reduction for incomes 200%–250% FPL | 0.73 (0.064)*** | 0.79 (0.072)* |
Silver, cost-sharing reduction for incomes 150%–200% FPL | 0.59 (0.057)*** | 0.68 (0.059)*** |
Silver, cost-sharing reduction for incomes 100%–150% FPL | 0.61 (0.052)*** | 0.70 (0.067)*** |
Gold | 0.79 (0.073)* | 0.79 (0.057)** |
Female | 1.00 (0.010) | |
Age (y) | ||
0−17 | 1.30 (0.030)*** | |
18−29 | 1.70 (0.078)*** | |
30−44 | 1.48 (0.015)*** | |
45−63 | Ref | |
ZIP code level factors (%) | ||
Graduated high school | 1.07 (0.020)*** | |
White | 1.01 (0.046) | |
Black | 1.07 (0.014)*** | |
Asian | 1.11 (0.039)** | |
Hispanic | 1.16 (0.024)*** | |
Observations | 307,937 | 307,937 |
All ZIP code level factors are standardized so that each additional unit of the predictor corresponds to a one-SD increase. Observations were clustered within person, within geographic area, and within health insurance plan. SEs were clustered at the highest level of aggregation (the plan).14,15
FPL indicates Federal Poverty Level.
P < 0.10.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.001.