. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 23.

Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov 19;7(3):502–515. doi: 10.1177/2167702618809366

Table 2.

Factorial ANOVA Results for Probability Estimations of Stimulus Reinforcement Likelihoods After the Probabilistic Learning Task

Probability Estimation Outcome	GAD M(SD)	Non-GAD M(SD)	Predictor	F	p	η_p²x	Levene’s test
Probability Estimation Outcome	GAD M(SD)	Non-GAD M(SD)	Predictor	F	p	η_p²x	F	p
Total probability estimation accuracy	54.827 (28.114)	47.600 (20.178)	GAD status	5.246	.023^*	.019
			Condition	0.099	.753	.000	2.551	.056
			GAD × Condition	0.000	.983	.000
High (80%) probability stimulus accuracy	−25.382 (25.741)	−17.210 (23.000)	GAD status	6.835	.009^**	.025
			Condition	0.053	.818	.000	1.092	.353
			GAD × Condition	0.138	.711	.001
Chance (50%) probability stimulus accuracy	−3.229 (18.804)	−4.771 (17.397)	GAD status	0.356	.551	.001
			Condition	1.737	.189	.007	0.432	.737
			GAD × Condition	0.031	.860	.000
Low (20%) probability stimulus accuracy	6.045 (15.676)	3.943 (13.783)	GAD status	1.444	.231	.005
			Condition	0.945	.332	.004	0.380	.768
			GAD × Condition	1.956	.163	.007

Note: GAD = generalized anxiety disorder.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.