Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;14(8):e0221436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221436

Table 1. Cox proportional-hazards regression for survival.

Eye ring redness B SE Wald df P Hazard ratio Exp(B) 95% CI
Lower Upper
Treatment 5.682 3 0.128
Eye ring redness 0.317 0.122 6.701 1 0.010 0.729 0.573 0.926
Eye ring redness*treatment 7.961 3 0.047
 Eye ring redness*treatment (F) -0.061 0.156 0.154 1 0.695 1.063 0.783 1.444
 Eye ring redness*treatment (FA) -0.129 0.167 0.594 1 0.441 1.138 0.819 1.580
 Eye ring redness*treatment (T) -0.479 0.184 6.761 1 0.009 1.615 1.125 2.318
Bill redness B SE Wald df P Hazard ratio Exp(B) 95% CI
Lower Upper
Treatment 2.985 3 0.394
Bill redness 0.205 0.068 9.142 1 0.002 8.15 0.713 0.930
Bill redness*treatment 4.851 3 0.183
 Bill redness*treatment (F) -0.065 0.090 0.523 1 0.470 1.067 0.895 1.273
 Bill redness*treatment (FA) -0.094 0.109 0.737 1 0.391 1.098 0.887 1.360
 Bill redness*treatment (T) -0.197 0.092 4.585 1 0.032 1.218 1.017 1.459

*The relationship between trait redness and survival within flutamide (F), flutamide plus ATD (FA) or testosterone (T) groups using the same relationship in the control group as a reference.

P-values below 0.05 are shown in bold.