Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;14(8):e0221436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221436

Table 2. Cox proportional-hazards regression for survival and ornament (above eye ring, below bill) redness analyzed separately for each treatment.

Control (C), flutamide (F), flutamide plus ATD (FA) and testosterone (T).

Eye ring redness B SE Wald df P Hazard ratio Exp(B) 95% CI
Lower Upper
Control 0.368 0.133 7.688 1 0.006 0.692 -.368 0.133
Flutamide (F) 0.250 0.107 5.471 1 0.019 0.779 -.250 0.107
Flutamide + ATD (FA) 0.121 0.114 1.115 1 0.291 0.886 -.121 0.114
Testosterone (T) -0.194 0.140 1.915 1 0.166 1.214 .194 0.140
Bill redness B SE Wald df P Hazard ratio Exp(B) 95% CI
Lower Upper
Control 0.223 0.073 9.266 1 0.002 0.800 0.693 0.924
Flutamide (F) 0.140 0.067 4.390 1 0.036 0.869 0.762 0.991
Flutamide + ATD (FA) 0.086 0.083 1.062 1 0.303 0.918 0.780 1.080
Testosterone (T) 0.026 0.063 0.178 1 0.673 0.974 0.861 1.102

Control (C), flutamide (F), flutamide plus ATD (FA) and testosterone (T).