Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;9(8):e028855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028855

Table 2.

Meta-analytical outputs summarising baseline parameters of PVP compared with TURP

Parameter No of studies Sample size Heterogeneity (Total) Mean difference (95% CI) Test for overall effect
PVP TURP χ2 df I2 (%) P value
IPSS
 Baseline 14 1179 989 11.32 13 0 0.58 −0.29 (–0.68 to 0.10) Z=1.47 P=0.14
Qmax
 Baseline 14 1179 989 70.23 13 81 <0.01 0.05 (–0.51 to 0.61) Z=0.17 P=0.87
PVR
 Baseline 12 1016 864 9.24 11 0 0.6 2.19 (–3.22 to 7.6) Z=0.79 P=0.43
QoL
 Baseline 10 910 766 11.15 9 19 0.27 0.01 (–0.07 to 0.10) Z=0.33 P=0.74
IIEF
 Baseline 5 351 297 1.58 4 0 0.81 −0.13 (–0.86 to 0.60) Z=0.34 P=0.73

IIEF, International Index of Erectile Function; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; PVP, photoselective vaporisation of the prostate; PVR, postvoid residual volume; Qmax, maximum flow rate; QoL, quality of life; RR, risk ratio; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate.