Table 4.
Characteristic | Meet participant needsa | Active in five yearsb | Plan for continuance in placeb | Achieved permanent statusb | Middle-Range Program Resultsc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leadership Competence | −.03 [.911] | .52 [.011] | .44 [.035] | .48 [.021] | .47 [.023] |
Effective Collaboration | .14 [.526] | .48 [.022] | .35 [.105] | .47 [.023] | .47 [.024] |
Demonstrating Program Results | −.13 [.568] | .07 [.760] | −.06 [.778] | −.01 [.969] | −.03 [.882] |
Strategic Funding | .05 [.820] | .51 [.013] | .49 [.018] | .46 [.026] | .51 [.014] |
Staff Involvement and Integration | −.20 [.358] | .19 [.395] | .19 [.378] | −.00 [.992] | .10 [.667] |
Program Responsivity | −.20 [.352] | .23 [.290] | .22 [.318] | .16 [.446] | .20 [.357] |
Note: Values in the cells are r [p-value].
=Spearman Rho coefficients due to skewness
=Pearson Correlation coefficients
=composite score