Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jul 22;35(4):317–326. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000448

Table 1. Inclusion criteria for systematic review of psychological interventions for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Criterion Requirement for Inclusion
Population Adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Studies that included individuals with dual diagnosis and/or co-morbidity were eligible for inclusion.
Intervention Psychological interventions, which include ‘psychological therapy’, IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies), integrated care, collaborative care, talking therapies, psychological well-being practitioners, and/or liaison workers.
Comparator Comparison with routine practice or no intervention, or with any of the above interventions.
Outcomes Full economic evaluation relating costs and outcomes in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), or some measure of net benefit that incorporates health outcomes. Studies had to include a ‘cost-effectiveness acceptability curve’ (CEAC) or explicitly report probabilities of being cost-effective to allow for an assessment of uncertainty.
Setting and study type Studies in a community, primary or outpatient setting.
Studies that include a full economic evaluation comparing both costs and outcomes.
Any study types/designs except case reports.
Other Journal articles published in English language between January 2000 and November 2018.