Table 1. Inclusion criteria for systematic review of psychological interventions for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Criterion | Requirement for Inclusion |
---|---|
Population | Adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Studies that included individuals with dual diagnosis and/or co-morbidity were eligible for inclusion. |
Intervention | Psychological interventions, which include ‘psychological therapy’, IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies), integrated care, collaborative care, talking therapies, psychological well-being practitioners, and/or liaison workers. |
Comparator | Comparison with routine practice or no intervention, or with any of the above interventions. |
Outcomes | Full economic evaluation relating costs and outcomes in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), or some measure of net benefit that incorporates health outcomes. Studies had to include a ‘cost-effectiveness acceptability curve’ (CEAC) or explicitly report probabilities of being cost-effective to allow for an assessment of uncertainty. |
Setting and study type | Studies in a community, primary or outpatient setting. Studies that include a full economic evaluation comparing both costs and outcomes. Any study types/designs except case reports. |
Other | Journal articles published in English language between January 2000 and November 2018. |