Table 2.
Diagnostic performance of miRNA panels in pancreatic cancer
Study | County | Cases vs Controls | Specimen | Stage | miRNA | SEN | SPE | AUC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Age(y) | Male (%) | ||||||||
Franklin, 2018a21 | Sweden | 23/22 | 64/62 | 52/55 | Plasma | I-II | Panel A | / | / | 0.96 |
Duell, 2017b20 | Europec | 29/29 | / | / | Plasma | / | Panel B | / | / | 0.73 |
Johansen, 201634 | Denmark | 86/44 | 67/55 | 57/50 | Serum | I-IV | Panel C | 85 | 67 | 0.84 |
Panel D | 85 | 71 | 0.72 | |||||||
Denmark, Germany | 153/247 | / | / | Serum | I-II | Panel E | 86 | 68 | 0.83 | |
Panel F | 83 | 73 | 0.86 | |||||||
Panel C | 82 | 60 | 0.77 | |||||||
Panel D | 86 | 73 | 0.87 | |||||||
Denmark, Germany | 11/247 | / | / | Serum | I | Panel E | 73 | 68 | 0.70 | |
Panel F | 55 | 73 | 0.76 | |||||||
Panel C | 82 | 60 | 0.74 | |||||||
Panel D | 64 | 73 | 0.78 | |||||||
Denmark, Germany | 142/247 | / | / | Serum | II | Panel E | 87 | 68 | 0.84 | |
Panel F | 85 | 73 | 0.87 | |||||||
Panel C | 82 | 60 | 0.77 | |||||||
Panel D | 88 | 73 | 0.88 | |||||||
Alemar, 201636 | Brazil | 24/10 | 62/NA | 50/NA | Serum | I-IV | −21, −34a | / | / | 0.89 |
Slater, 201441 | Germany | 9/10 | / | / | Serum | I-IV | −196b, −196a | 100 | 100 | 1.00 |
Lin, 201442 | China | 49/27 | 62/61 | 55/56 | Serum | I-IV | −663a, −492 | 86 | 80 | 0.87 |
Ganepola, 201443 | USA | 11/11 | 68/46 | 54/54 | Plasma | II | Panel G | 91 | 91 | 0.97 |
Liu, R, 201246 | China | 95/81 | / | / | Serum | I-IV | Panel H | 94 | 93 | 0.99 |
Liu, J, 201247 | China | 138/68 | 62/61 | 64/66 | Plasma | I-IV | −16, −196a | 87 | 74 | 0.90 |
Wang, 200948 | USA | 28/19 | / | / | Plasma | / | Panel I | 64 | 89 | 0.82 |
Notes: aRepresents the study concluded prospective and cross-sectional study and the data extracted from the part of cross-sectional study; brepresents the incidence of Pancreatic Cancer by follow-up 5 years); c10 European countries including Denmark (Aarhus, Copenhagen), France, Germany (Heidelberg, Potsdam), Greece, Italy (Florence, Turin, Varese, Naples, Ragusa), The Netherlands (Bilthoven, Utrecht), Norway, Spain (Asturias, Granada, Murcia, Navarra, Guipuzcoa), Sweden (Malmo, Umeå) and the United Kingdom (Oxford, Cambridge); SENs, SPEs, and AUCs in bold fonts represent results from validation set (non-bold fonts represent results without validation). Panel A (15 miRs): −106b, −574, −34a, −451a, −130b, −26a, −144, −423, −101, −122,-24, −22-5p, let-7d-3p, −197, −885-5p; Panel B: −10a, −10b, −21, −30c, −106b, −155, −212; Panel C: −16, −27a, −25, −29c, −483-5p; Panel D (12 miRs): −16, −18a, −24, −27a, −30a, −323, −20a, −25, −29c,-191, −345, −483-5p; Panel E: −16, −27a, −30a, −323, −20a, −29c, −483-5p; Panel F: −16, −24, −27a, −30a, −323, −20a, −25, −29c, −483-5p; Panel G: −22, −642b, −885-5p; Panel H: −20a, −21, −24, −25, −99a, −185, −191; Panel I: −21, −210, −155, 196a.
Abbreviations: SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; AUC, area under the curve; NA: not available.