Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;17(7):347–354. doi: 10.1089/met.2019.0006

Table 3.

Macronutrient Consumption Differences Based on Food Security Status and SNAP Usagea

  Overall Food secure Food insecure Food insecure vs. secure
n = 2392 n = 1795 n = 597
Food security status Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) P
Calories 2114 (2065–2163) 2138 (2079–2196) 1996 (1896–2095) 0.03
% carbohydrates 52.74 (52.18–53.30) 52.61 (52.03–53.20) 53.32 (52.02–54.61) 0.32
% protein 14.94 (14.71–15.12) 14.90 (14.69–14.37) 14.84 (14.37–15.30) 0.77
% saturated fat 11.27 (11.11–11.45) 11.34 (11.14–11.54) 10.96 (10.59–11.32) 0.08
% total fat 33.05 (32.59–33.51) 33.18 (32.62–33.73) 32.57 (31.58–33.55) 0.31
  Overall Did not use SNAP Used SNAP  
  n = 1704 n = 1165 n = 539 SNAP usage vs. nonusage
SNAP utilization Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) P
Calories 2154 (2098–2209) 2169 (2148–2190) 2061 (1706–2416) 0.34
% carbohydrates 53.01 (52.29–53.73) 52.55 (48.83–56.28) 54.12 (49.03–59.22) 0.52
% protein 14.62 (14.40–14.85) 14.71 (14.03–15.40) 14.34 (13.14–15.54) 0.48
% saturated fat 11.30 (11.07–11.53) 11.48 (10.20–12.75) 10.83 (8.70–12.97) 0.50
% total fat 33.00 (32.38–33.62) 33.25 (30.20–36.30) 32.29 (27.81–36.77) 0.64

Bold text refers to statistically significant differences between the food secure and food insecure groups (P < 0.05).

a

Food recall and food stamps usage data were not complete for the entire sample. Unweighted n's and weighted statistics are reported. All analyses controlled for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and household income.